Dynamic interactions between spatial change and travel behavior variation in old town fringe


  • Wenzhu Zhou
  • Qiao Li
  • Zhibin Li
  • Nan Wang
  • Qi Wang




Old town fringe area is changing in its spatial features, and these changes correspondingly result in variations in travel behaviors. Taking the spatial characteristics and travel behavior data of the Nanjing Old Town Fringe (OTF) area in 2010 and 2015 as an example, we conducted a comparative study for two years. First, based on the identification of the spatial range of OTF in these two years by using travel data mutation points and the Point of Information (POI) kernel analysis method, the significant change in the OTF area, from marginal areas in 2010 to non-marginal areas in 2015, was identified. Second, multiple logit models were used to evaluate the impact of the built environment and economic and social attributes of residents on the choice of travel modes, as well as the different impact factors. From the perspective of overall performance, with reference to the behavior of choosing motor vehicle travel, from 2010 to 2015, the significant correlation of factors in promoting residents to choose walking, cycling or public transit changed. Moreover, there were three different dynamic characteristics of this correlation change: (1) the correlation of factors was significant and stable from 2010 to 2015; (2) the correlation of factors was significant in 2010 but not significant in 2015; (3) the correlation of factors was not significant in 2010 but was significant in 2015. It was found that the correlated factors of fluctuation were mainly social attribute factors, for example, education, gender, age, whether having a driver’s license, etc. Therefore, in future research and practice, we need to focus on the impact of stable correlated factors (such as shortest distance to downtown, plot ratio, occupation, etc.) and factors with increasing correlations (such as bus coverage, gender, age, etc.). And the land-mix factor needs to be considered from both vertical and horizontal perspectives. This will have certain significance and help future development of OTF areas.


Bohte, W., Maat, K., & van Wee, B. (2009). Measuring attitudes in research on residential self-selection and travel behavior: A review of theories and empirical research. Transport Reviews, 29(3), 325–357.

Bowman, J. L., & Ben-Akiva, M. E. (2001). Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules. Transportation Research, Part A (Policy and Practice), 35(1), 0–28.

Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Handy, S. L. (2007). Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior? A structural equations modeling approach. Transportation, 34(5), 535–556.

Cervero, R., & Murakami, J. (2010). Effects of built environments on vehicle miles traveled: Evidence from 370 US urbanized areas. Environment and Planning A, 42(2), 400–418.

Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199–219.

Chen, X., Wang, S., Shi, C., Wu, H., Zhao, J., & Fu, J. (2019). Robust ship tracking via multi-view learning and sparse representation. Journal of Navigation, 72(1), 176–192.

Chen, X., Li, Z., Wang, Y., Tang, J., Zhu, W., Shi, C., & Wu, H. (2018). Anomaly detection and cleaning of highway elevation data from Google Earth using ensemble empirical mode decomposition. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 144(5), 04018015.

Chen, Y. Q. (1996). On the urban-rural ecotone and its characteristic and function. Economic Geography, 16(3),27–31.

Christian, H., Knuiman, M., Divitini, M., Foster, S., Hooper, P., ...Giles-Corti, B. (2017). A longitudinal analysis of the influence of the neighborhood environment on recreational walking within the neighborhood: Results from RESIDE. Environmental Health Perspectives,125 (7), 077009.

Commins, N., & Nolan, A. (2011). The determinants of mode of transport to work in the Greater Dublin Area. Transport Policy, 18(1), 259–268.

Ding, C., Wang, D., Liu, C., Zhang, Y., & Yang, J. (2017). Exploring the influence of built environment on travel mode choice considering the mediating effects of car ownership and travel distance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 100, 65–80.

Ettema, D., & Nieuwenhuis, R. (2017). Residential self-selection and travel behavior: What are the effects of attitudes, reasons for location choice and the built environment? Journal of Transport Geography, 59, 146–155.

Feng, J. (2017). The influence of built environment on travel behavior of the elderly in urban China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 619–633.

Feng, J., Dijst, M., Wissink, B., & Prillwitz, J. (2014). Understanding mode choice in the Chinese context: The case of Nanjing Metropolitan Area. Journal of Economic & Social Geography, 105(3), 3.

Gu, C. L., Chen, T., & Ding, J. H. (1993). Study on the characteristics of the border area of China's big cities. Geography Journal, 48(4), 317–328.

Gu, C. L., & Chen, T. (1995). The study of the urban fringes in China. Beijing, China: Science Press.

Handy S. L., Boarnet, M. G., Ewing, R., Killingsworth, R. E. (2002), How the built environment affects physical activity: Views from urban planning. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2 Suppl), 64–73.

Khan, S., Maoh, H., Lee, C., & Anderson, W. (2014). Towards sustainable urban mobility: Investigating non-work travel behavior in a sprawled Canadian City. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(4), 141224081028003.

Lawrence, D. F., Schmid, T. L., Sallis, J. F., Chapman, J., Saelens, B. E. (2004). Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2), 117–125.

Lu, Y., Xiao, Y., & Ye, Y. (2016). Urban density, diversity and design: Is more always better for walking? A study from Hong Kong. Preventive Medicine, 2016, 103S.

Maat, K., & Timmermans, H. J. (2009). A causal model relating urban form with daily travel distance through activity/travel decisions. Transportation Planning and Technology, 32(2), 115–134.

Manaugh, K., Miranda-Moreno, L. F., & El-Geneidy, A. M. (2010). The effect of neighborhood characteristics, accessibility, home–work location, and demographics on commuting distances. Transportation, 37(4), 627–646.

Mu, X. D., Liu, H. P. (2010). The definition method of urban fringe based on the theory of regional urban structure and remote sensing monitoring. International Conference on Remote Sensing.

Munshi, T. (2016). Built environment and model choice relationship for commute travel in the city of Rajkot, India. Traffic Research Part D Traffic, 44, 239–253.

Naveen, E., Vincent, C., & Ahmed, M. E. (2002). Travel mode choice and transit route choice behavior in Montreal: Insights from McGill University members commute patterns. Public Transport, 4(2), 129–149.

Rong, Y. F., Guo, S. W., & Zhang, Y. F. (2011). A summary of research on urban fringes. Journal of Urban Planning, 04, 93–100.

Schwanen, T., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005). What affects commute mode choice: Neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods? Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 0–99.

Schwanen, T., Dieleman, F. M., & Dijst, M. (2004). The impact of metropolitan structure on commute behavior in the Netherlands: A multilevel approach. Growth and Change, 35(3), 304–333.

Shiftan, Y., & Barlach, Y. (2002). Effect of employment site characteristics on commute mode choice. Transportation Research Record. https://doi.org/10.3141/1781-03

Sun, G. (2014). Exploring the influence of changes to the built environment on walking behavior: A natural experiment within a university campus in Hong Kong (PhD dissertation and master’s thesis).

Ta, N., Chai, Y., Zhang, Y., & Sun, D. (2017). Understanding job-housing relationship and commuting pattern in Chinese cities: Past, present and future. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 562–573.

van Wee, B. (2009). Self-selection: A key to a better understanding of location choices, travel behavior and transport externalities? Transport Reviews, 29(3), 279–292.

Vandersmissen, M. H., Villeneuve, P., & Thériault, M. (2003). Analyzing changes in urban form and commuting time. The Professional Geographer, 55(4), 446–463.

Wang, Y., & Gu, C. L. (2017). Study on the delineation of urban elastic growth boundary based on grid analysis – a case study of Suzhu. City Planning Review, 41(3), 25–30.

Wang, H. Y., Zhang, X. C., Kang T.J., et al. (2011). Urban fringe division and feature analysis based on the multi-criterion judgment. Journal of Natural Resources, 26(4), 703–714.

Wei, Z., Yu, Q. P., De. W., et al. (2012) Travel behavior change after the introduction of public bicycle systems: A case study of Minhang District, Shanghai. Urban Planning Forum, 43(5), 76–81.

Yang, Z. W., & Xu, Y. (2012). Evolution of spatial structure of contemporary Suzhou border areas based on multi-interest. Journal of Urban Planning, 03, 37–43.

Ye, R., & Titheridge, H.. (2016). Satisfaction with the commute: The role of travel mode choice, built environment and attitudes. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52(B), 535–547.

Zegras, C. (2010). The built environment and motor vehicle ownership and use: Evidence from Santiago de Chile. Urban Studies, 47(8), 1793–1817.

Zhou, W. Z., Li, Q., Wang, N., Li, Z. B., Pu, Z. Y., & Wang Q. (2019). Old town fringe recognition and travel characteristics analysis based on multi-source data fusion. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 11(2),1–15.

Zhou, W. Z. (2003). Study on the spatial development mechanism of the old city center under traffic guidance. Nanjing, China: Southeast University Press.




How to Cite

Zhou, W., Li, Q., Li, Z., Wang, N., & Wang, Q. (2020). Dynamic interactions between spatial change and travel behavior variation in old town fringe. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 13(1), 559-584. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2020.1653



Special Issue: Innovations for Transport Planning in China