Which D’s are the important ones? The effects of regional location and density on driving distance in Oslo and Stavanger
Petter Naess
Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Urban and Regional Planning
Xinyu (Jason) Cao
University of Minnesota, Humphrey School of Public Affairs
Arvid Strand
Institute of Transport Economics
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2017.1183
Keywords: Built environment, monocentric, polycentric, self-selection, travel behavior, longitudinal
Abstract
Based on a study in the Greater Oslo and Greater Stavanger urban areas in Norway, this paper employs quantitative and qualitative research methods to investigate the influences of residential location and neighborhood characteristics on car driving distances. Cross-sectional and quasi-longitudinal analyses show that built environment characteristics — especially the distance from the dwelling to the main city center — influence driving distances in both urban areas. In Stavanger, the impact of inward moving seems to be larger than that of outward moving, possibly reflecting self-selection to the inner city. In the relatively monocentric Greater Oslo, the distance to the city center has a stronger impact on weekday driving than on weekend driving. In the more polycentric Greater Stavanger, where the importance of downtown as a destination for commuting is weaker, the distance to the city center has similar effects on weekday and weekend driving. In Greater Stavanger, distance to the secondary center Sandnes also plays a role although the impact is small. Population density and job density have impacts in Greater Oslo but not in Greater Stavanger, where we instead find a weak effect of local-area job surplus. There is no tendency toward compensatory increased weekend driving among inner-city dwellers in either Greater Oslo or Greater Stavanger.Author Biography
Petter Naess, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Urban and Regional Planning
Professor in Planning in Urban RegionsReferences
Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Archibugi, F. (1997). The ecological city and the city effect: Essays on the urban planning requirements for the sustainable city. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Babbie, E. R. (2007). The practice of social research (11th ed). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Banister, D. (1992). Energy use, transport and settlement patterns. In M. Breheny (Ed.), Sustainable development and urban form (pp. 160–181). London: Pion.
Bhaskar, R. (1993). Dialectic: The pulse of freedom. London: Routledge.
Bhaskar, R. (1998). The possibility of naturalism. A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences (3rd ed.). London/New York: Routledge. (First published 1979)
Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science (with a new introduction). London/New York: Routledge (First published 1975)
Boarnet, M. G. & Crane, R. (2001). Travel by design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bruegmann, R. (2005). Sprawl: A compact history. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Cao, X., Næss, P., & Wolday, F. (2017). Urban containment and inner-city densification reduce auto ownership. Paper presented at the WSTLUR symposium, Brisbane, July 2017.
Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Handy, S. (2009). Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: A focus on empirical findings. Transport Reviews, 29(3), 359–395.
Cao, X., Xu, F., & Fan, Y. (2010). Exploring the connections among residential location, self-selection, and driving: Propensity score matching with multiple treatments. Transportation Research Part A, 44, 797–805.
Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2, 199–219.
Christensen, L. (1996, March). Location-dependence of transportation trends: The importance of city class. Denmark contribution to the COST Citair Workshop on Land Use, Planning and Transport, Stockholm, Sweden. Roskilde: Danish National Environmental Research Institute.
Christiansen, P., Gundersen, F., and Gregersen, F. A. (2016). Kompakte byer og lite bilbruk? Reisemønster og arealbruk. TØI rapport 1505. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics.
Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU) (2013, March 25). Canons of sustainable architecture and urbanism. A companion to the charter of new urbanism. Retrieved from http://www.cnu.org/sites/files/Canons.pdf
Crano, W. D., Brewer, M. B., & Lac, A. (2015). Principles and methods of social research (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Danermark, B., Ekström, M., Jacobsen, L., & Karlsson, J. C. (2001). Explaining society. Critical realism in the social sciences. London/New York: Routledge.
De Vos, J., Derudder, B., Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F. (2012). Reducing car use: Changing attitudes or relocating? The influence of residential dissonance on travel behavior. Journal of Transport Geography 22, 1–9.
De Vos, J. (2015). The influence of land use and mobility policy on travel behavior: A comparative case study of Flanders and the Netherlands. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 8(1), 171–190.
Ehenique, M., Hargreaves, A. J., Mitchell, D., & Namdeo, A. (2012). Growing cities sustainably: Does urban form really matter? Journal of the American Planning Association, 78(2), 121–137.
Engebretsen, Ø., & Christiansen, P. (2011). Bystruktur og transport. TØI rapport 1178. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics.
EPA. (2017). About smart growth. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/about-smart-growth#smartgrowth
Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76, 1–30.
Federal Highway Administration (2009). Summary of travel trends. 2009 National Household Travel Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
Fishman, R. (1996). Bourgeois utopias: Visions of suburbia. In S. Fainstein & S. Campbell (Eds.), Readings in urban theory, (pp. 23–71). Malden, MA/Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Gould, W. (2011). Use poisson rather than regress; tell a friend. Stata blog. Retrieved from http://blog. stata. com/2011/08/22/use-poisson-rather-than-regress-tell-a-friend
Grunfelder, J., & Nielsen, T. S. (2012). Commuting behavior and urban form: A longitudinal study of a polycentric urban region in Denmark. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 112, 2–14.
Giuliano, G. & Small, K. (1993). Is the journey to work explained by urban structure? Urban Studies, 30(9), 1485 - 1500.
Hägerstrand, T. (1970). What about people in regional science? Papers in Regional Science, 24, 7–24. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5597.1970.tb01464.x
Healey, P., & Williams, R. (1993). European planning systems: Diversity and convergence. Urban Studies, 30, 701–720.
Hickman, R., & Banister, D. (2015). New household location and the commute to work: Changes over time. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Holden, E. (2007). Achieving sustainable mobility—Everyday and leisure-time travel in the EU. Aldershot, UK and Burlington, USA: Ashgate.
Kenworthy J. R. (2003). Transport energy use and greenhouse gases in urban passenger transport systems: A study of 84 global cities. Perth: Murdoch University.
Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Laidet, L. (1997). A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay area. Transportation, 24, 125–158.
Lefévre, B. (2010). Urban transport energy consumption: Determinants and strategies for its reduction. An analysis of the literature. Sapiens, 2, 1–17.
Lian, J. I. (2004). Delvis brukerfinansiert utbygging av transportsystemet i Oslo og Akershus. Evaluering av Oslopakke 1 og 2. TØI rapport 714. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics.
Milakis, D., Vlastos, T., & Barbopoplos, N. (2008). Relationships between urban form and travel behavior in Athens, Greece. A comparison with Western European and North American results. European Journal of Transport Infrastructure Research, 8, 201–215.
Mogridge, M. H. J. (1985). Transport, land use and energy interaction. Urban Studies, 22, 481–492.
Næss, P. (2005). Residential location affects travel behavior — but how and why? The case of Copenhagen Metropolitan Area. Progress in Planning, 63, 167–257.
Næss, P. (2012). Urban form and travel behavior: experience from a Nordic context. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 5(2), 21–45.
Næss, P. (2013). Residential location, transport rationales and daily-life travel behavior: The case of Hangzhou Metropolitan Area, China. Progress in Planning, 79(1), 1–50.
Næss, P. (2015). Built environment, causality and travel. Transport Reviews, 35(3), 275–291.
Næss, P. (2016). Built environment, causality and urban planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(1), 52–71.
Næss, P., Sandberg, S. L., & Røe, P. G. (1996). Energy use for transportation in 22 Nordic towns. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 13, 79–97.
Næss, P., Strand, A., Wolday, F., & Stefansdottir, H. (in press). Residential location, commuting and non-work travel in two urban areas of different size and with different center structures. Forthcoming in Progress in Planning.
Newman, P. W. G., & Kenworthy, J. R. (1989). Gasoline consumption and cities: A comparison of US cities with a global survey. Journal of the American Planning Association, 55, 24–37.
Norway’s government (2014). Statlige planretningslinjer for samordnet bolig-, areal- og transportplanlegging. Oslo: The Norwegian Government. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/Statlige-planretningslinjer-for-samordnet-bolig--areal--og-transportplanlegging/id2001539/
Rogalandsavisen, R. A. (2017). Fra 45.000 til 40.000 arbeidsplasser på Forus. RA Rogalandsavisen, January 6, 2018. http://www.dagsavisen.no/rogalandsavis/fra-45-000-til-40-000-arbeidsplasser-pa-forus-1.910055
Saelens, B. E., & Handy, S. (2008). Built environment correlates of walking: A review. Journal of Medical Science, Sports and Exercise, 40(7 Suppl), S550–S566.
Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science. A realist approach (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Schafer A., & Victor D. (1997). The past and future of global mobility. Scientific American, 277, 36–39.
Schwanen, T., Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005). What affects commute mode choice: Neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods? Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 83–99.
Stevens, M.R. (2017). Does compact development make people drive less? Journal of the American Planning Association, 83, 7–18.
Sustainable Cities Institute. (2017). Transit-oriented development (TOD). Retrieved from http://www.sustainablecitiesinstitute.org/topics/land-use-and-planning/transit-oriented-development-%28tod%29
Tjeldflaat, L. O. (n.d.). Rebat-møte: Stavangerregion. Presentation at meeting in the professional network for regional housing, land use and transport planning in the major urban regions. Retrieved January 8, 2017, from https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/c18628827907457d97501ee0be093a92/tjeldflaat.pdf
UN Habitat. (2013). Planning and design for sustainable urban mobility—Global report on human settlements 2013. London and New York: Routledge.
Van Wee, B. (2009). Self-selection: A key to a better understanding of location choices, travel behavior and transport externalities? Transport Reviews, 29(3), 272–292.
Van Wee, B. (2013). Land use and transport. In B. van Wee, J. A. Annema, & D. Banister (Eds.), The transport system and transport policy. An introduction (pp. 78–100). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Vilhelmson, B. (1990). Vår Dagliga Rörlighet: om Resandets Utveckling, Fördelning och Gränser. TFB report 1990:16. Stockholm: Swedish Transportation Research Board.
Woods, L., & Ferguson, N. S. (2014). The influence of urban form on car travel following residential relocation: A current and retrospective study in Scottish urban areas. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 7(1), 95–104.
Zegras, C. (2010). The built environment and motor vehicle ownership and use: Evidence from Santiago de Chile. Urban Studies, 47, 1793–1817.
Zhou, B., & Kockelman, K. (2008). Self-selection in home choice: Use of treatment effects in evaluating the relationship between the built environment and travel behavior. Transportation Research Record, 2077, 54–61.
