Advancing cycling among women: An exploratory study of North American cyclists
AbstractPast studies show that women cycle at a lower rate than men due to various factors; few studies examine attitudes and perceptions of women cyclists on a large scale. This study aims to fill that gap by examining the cycling behaviors of women cyclists across multiple cities in North America. We analyzed an online survey of 1,868 women cyclists in the US and Canada, most of whom were confident when cycling. The survey recorded respondents’ cycling skills, attitude, perceptions of safety, surrounding environment, and other factors that may affect the decision to bicycle for transport and recreation. We utilized tree-based machine learning methods (e.g., bagging, random forests, boosting) to select the most common motivations and concerns of these cyclists. Then we used chi-squared and non-parametric tests to examine the differences among cyclists of different skills and those who cycled for utilitarian and non-utilitarian purposes. Tree-based model results indicated that concerns about the lack of bicycle facilities, cycling culture, cycling’s practicality, sustainability, and health were among the most important factors for women to cycle for transport or recreation. We found that very few cyclists cycled by necessity. Most cyclists, regardless of their comfort level, preferred cycling on facilities that were separated from vehicular traffic (e.g., separated bike lanes, trails). Our study suggests opportunities for designing healthy cities for women. Cities may enhance safety to increase cycling rates of women by tailoring policy prescriptions for cyclists of different skill groups who have different concerns. Strategies that were identified as beneficial across groups, such as investing in bicycle facilities and building a cycling culture in communities and at the workplace, could be useful to incorporate in long-range planning efforts.
Abasahl, F., Kelarestaghi, K. B., & Ermagun, A. (2018). Gender gap generators for bicycle mode choice in Baltimore college campuses. Travel Behavior and Society, 11, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2018.01.002
Akar, G., Fischer, N., & Namgung, M. (2013). Bicycling choice and gender case study: The Ohio State University. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7(5), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2012.673694
Aldred, R. (2016). Cycling near misses: Their frequency, impact, and prevention. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 90, 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.04.016
Antoniou, C., & Koutsopoulos, H. (2006). Estimation of traffic dynamics models with machine-learning methods. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1965, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.3141/1965-11
Arentze, T. A., & Timmermans, H. J. P. (2004). A learning-based transportation-oriented simulation system. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 38(7), 613–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2002.10.001
Bonham, J., & Wilson, A. (2012). Bicycling and the life course: The start-stop-start experiences of women cycling. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 6(4), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2011.585219
Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24(2), 123–140. doi org/10.1023/
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
Bühlmann, P., & Hothorn, T. (2007). Boosting algorithms: Regularization, prediction and model fitting. Statistical Science, 22(4), 477–505. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-STS242
Damant-Sirois, G., & El-Geneidy, A. M. (2015). Who cycles more? Determining cycling frequency through a segmentation approach in Montreal, Canada. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.03.028
Dill, J. (2009a). Bicycling for transportation and health: The role of infrastructure. Journal of Public Health Policy, 30(1), S95–S110.
Dill, J. (2009b). Comfort + convenience = more women biking. The League of American Bicyclists Webinar. Retrieved from https://bikeleague.org/sites/default/files/Dill%20LAB%20women%20on%20a%20roll%20webinar.pdf on May 8, 2019.
Dill, J., & McNeil, N. (2013). Four types of cyclists? Examination of typology for better understanding of bicycling behavior and potential. Transportation Research Record, 2387(1), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.3141/2387-15
Dill, J., & McNeil, N. (2016). Revisiting the four types of cyclists. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2587, 90–99. https://doi.org/10.3141/2587-11
Ding, A., Zhao, X., & Jiao, L. (2002). Traffic flow time series prediction based on statistics learning theory. In Proceedings of the IEEE 5th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (pp. 727–730). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2002.1041308
Ding, C., Cao, X., & Næss, P. (2018). Applying gradient boosting decision trees to examine non-linear effects of the built environment on driving distance in Oslo. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 110, 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.02.009
Emond, C., Tang, W., & Handy, S. (2009). Explaining gender difference in bicycling behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2125, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3141/2125-03
Garrard, J. (2003). Healthy revolutions: Promoting cycling among women. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 14(3), 213–215. https://doi.org/10.1071/he03213
Garrard, J., Handy, S., & Dill, J. (2012). Women and cycling. In City Cycling (pp. 211–234). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hhjxr.14
Garrard, J., Rose, G., & Lo, S. K. (2008). Promoting transportation cycling for women: The role of bicycle infrastructure. Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.010
Geller, R. (2006). Four types of transportation cyclists. Retrieved from https://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/article/158497
Gong, L., Kanamori, R., & Yamamoto, T. (2017). Data selection in machine learning for identifying trip purposes and travel modes from longitudinal GPS data collection lasting for seasons. Travel Behavior and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2017.03.004
Gong, L., Morikawa, T., Yamamoto, T., & Sato, H. (2014). Deriving personal trip data from GPS data: A literature review on the existing methodologies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 138, 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.239
Grudgings, N., Hagen-Zanker, A., Hughes, S., Gatersleben, B., Woodall, M., & Bryans, W. (2018). Why don’t more women cycle? An analysis of female and male commuter cycling mode-share in England and Wales. Journal of Transport & Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.07.004
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Second Edition (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Heesch, K. C., Sahlqvist, S., & Garrard, J. (2012). Gender differences in recreational and transport cycling: A cross-sectional mixed-methods comparison of cycling patterns, motivators, and constraints. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 106.
Jahangiri, A., & Rakha, H. A. (2015). Applying machine learning techniques to transportation mode recognition using mobile phone sensor data. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(5), 2406–2417. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2015.2405759
James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2014). An Introduction to statistical learning: With Applications in R. New York: Springer.
Ma, L., Dill, J., & Mohr, C. (2014). The objective versus the perceived environment: What matters for bicycling? Transportation, 41(6), 1135–1152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9520-y
McGuckin, N., Zmud, J., & Nakamoto, Y. (2005). Trip-chaining trends in the United States: Understanding travel behavior for policy making. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1917, 199–204. https://doi.org/10.3141/1917-22
Morris, E. A., & Guerra, E. (2014). Mood and mode: Does how we travel affect how we feel? Transportation, 42(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9521-x
Moudon, A. V., Lee, C., Cheadle, A. D., Collier, C. W., Johnson, D., Schmid, T. L., & Weather, R. D. (2005). Cycling and the built environment, a US perspective. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 10(3), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2005.04.001
Nordbakke, S., & Schwanen, T. (2014). Well-being and mobility: A theoretical framework and literature review focusing on older people. Mobilities, 9(1), 104–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2013.784542
Páez, A., & Whalen, K. (2010). Enjoyment of commute: A comparison of different transportation modes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 44(7), 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.04.003
Pucher, J., Buehler, R., & Seinen, M. (2011). Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(6), 451–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.03.001
Sibley, A. (2010). Women’s cycling survey: Analysis of results. University of North Carolina Greensboro. Retrieved from http://womencyclingproject.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/womens_cycling_survey_091420.pdf
Singleton, P. A. (2017). Exploring the positive utility of travel and mode choice. Retrieved from https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/35399
Singleton, P. A., & Goddard, T. (2016). Cycling by choice or necessity? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2598, 110–118. https://doi.org/10.3141/2598-13
Smith, O. (2017). Commute well-being differences by mode: Evidence from Portland, Oregon, USA. Journal of Transport & Health, 4(Supplement C), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.08.005
Teschke, K., Chinn, A., & Brauer, M. (2017). Proximity to four bikeway types and neighborhood-level cycling mode share of male and female commuters. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 10(1) 695–713. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2017.943
Varian, H. R. (2014). Big data: New tricks for econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.2.3
Xing, Y., Handy, S. L., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2010). Factors associated with proportions and miles of bicycling for transportation and recreation in six small US cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2009.09.004
Copyright (c) 2019 Huyen TK Le, Alyson West, Fionnuala Quinn, Steve Hankey
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JTLU agree to the following terms: 1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. 3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.