Workplace location, polycentricism, and car commuting


  • Fitwi Wolday Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Urban and Regional Planning
  • Petter Naess Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Urban and Regional Planning
  • Anders Tønnesen Institute of Transport Economics



Workplace location, commuting distance, commuting mode, polycentrism


Although significant strides have been made regarding the relationship between urban structure and travel, some doubt appears to be lingering concerning the impacts of polycentric urban development. For example, the debate on whether a polycentric or monocentric workplace location pattern is favorable for reducing negative environmental effects from transportation has not been entirely settled. This study intends to contribute to clearing up some of the misconceptions by focusing on the implications of spatial distribution of jobs on commuting patterns among employees within the Oslo metropolitan area. Results show a strong tendency for a higher share of car commuting among employees working in suburban workplaces. This pattern persists also for suburban workplaces located close to suburban transit nodes. The share of transit commuters shows the opposite pattern. Commuting distances also tend to increase the farther from the city center the workplace is located. These conclusions are based on cross-sectional and quasi-longitudinal survey data as well as semi-structured in-depth interviews of workers, including several interviewees who had changed their workplace locations. To our knowledge, this is the first mixed-methods study on the influence of workplace location on commuting behavior. The results raise doubt about the appropriateness of polycentric intra-metropolitan workplace development as a strategy for sustainable mobility.

Author Biography

Petter Naess, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Urban and Regional Planning

Professor in Planning in Urban Regions


Aguiléra, A., Wenglenski, S., & Proulhac, L. (2009). Employment suburbanization, reverse commuting and travel behavior by residents of the central city in the Paris metropolitan area. Transportation Research A, 43(7): 685–691.

Aguiléra, A., & Voisin, M. (2014). Urban form, commuting patterns and CO2 emissions: What differences between the municipality’s residents and its jobs? Transportation Research Part A, 69, 243–251.

Allpass, J., Ågergard, E., Harvest, J., Olsen, P. A., & Søholt, S. (1967). Urban centers and changes in the center structure. In Proceedings of the International Study Week (pp. 103–117), September 11–17, 1996, Amsterdam, 1966. Leiden, The Netherlands: E. J. Brill.

Alonso, W. (1960). A theory of the urban land market. Papers in Regional Science, 6, 149–157.

Bell, D. A. (1991). Office location: City or suburbs? Transportation, 18, 239–259.

Bell, T. (1999). Polycentric law in the new century. Policy, 1999-Autumn, 34–37. Retrieved from

Bertaud, A. (2003). The spatial organization of cities: Deliberate outcome or unforeseen consequence, World development report 2003. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from

Cervero, R., & Landis, J. (1992). Suburbanization of jobs and the journey to work: A submarket analysis of commuting in the San Francisco Bay area. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 26, 275–297.

Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2, 199–219.

Cervero, R., Sarmiento, O. L., Jacoby, E., Gomez, L. F., & Neiman, A. (2009). Influences of built environments on walking and cycling: Lessons from Bogotá. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 3, 203–226.

Cervero, R., & Duncan, M. (2006). Which reduces vehicle travel more: Jobs-housing balance or retail-housing mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(4), 475–490.

Clifton, K., Ewing, R., & Song, Y. (2008). Quantitative analysis of urban form: A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 1(1), 17–45.

Crane, R., & Chatman, D. (2003). As jobs sprawl, whither the commute? Access, 23, 14–19. Retrieved from

Danish Business Authority. (2017). The Fingerplan 2017. Copenhagen: Danish Business Authority. Retrieved from

Dasgupta, M. (1994). Urban travel demand and policy impacts. Paper presented at the urban environment and transport policy course at the Norwegian Institute of Technology, January 1994, Trondheim, Norway.

Davoudi, S., & Sturzaker, J. (2017). Urban form, policy packaging and sustainable urban metabolism. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 120, 55–64.

Davoudi, S. (2003). Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies, 11(8), 979–999.

Duarte, C. M., & Fernández, M. T. (2017). The influence of urban structure on commuting: An analysis for the main metropolitan systems in Spain. Procedia Engineering, 198, 52–68.

Engebretsen, Ø., Næss, P., & Strand, A. (2018). Residential location, workplace location and car driving in four Norwegian cities. European Planning Studies, 26(10), 2036–2057.

Garcia-López, M. A. (2010). Population suburbanization in Barcelona, 1991–2005: Is its spatial structure changing? Journal of Housing Economics, 19, 131–144.

Gordon, P., & Lee, B. (2015). Spatial structure and travel: Trends in commuting and non-commuting travels in US metropolitan areas. In R. Hickman, M. Givoni, D. Bonilla, & D. Banister (Eds.), An international handbook on transport and development (pp. 87–103). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. Retrieved from

Gordon, P., Kumar, A., & Richardson, H. W. (1989). The influence of metropolitan spatial structure on commuting time. Journal of Urban Economics, 26, 138–151.

Gordon, P., Richardson, H. W., & Jun, M.-J. (1991). The commuting paradox: Evidence from the top twenty. Journal of the American Planning Association, 57, 416–420.

Guth, D., Holz-Rau, C., & Maciolek, M. (2009). Employment suburbanization and commuter traffic in German city regions. Paper presented at for 9th Swiss Transport Research Conference, September 9–11, Ascona, Switzerland. Retrieved from

Hanssen, J. U. (1995). Transportation impacts of office relocation: A case study from Oslo. Journal of Transport Geography, 3, 247–256.

Hartoft-Nielsen, P. (2001). Arbejdspladslokalisering og transportadfærd. Hørsholm: Forskningscenteret for skov og landskab.

Hartoft-Nielsen, P., & Reiter, I. (2017). Trafikale effekter af stationsnær lokalisering i hovedstadsområdet 2017 – første rapport med hovedresultater og analyser. Copenhagen: Aalborg University. Retrieved from

Hess, D. B. (2001). Effect of free parking on commuter mode choice: Evidence from travel diary data. Transportation Research Record, 1753, 35–42.

Hu, L., & Schneider, R. J. (2017). Different ways to get to the same workplace: How does workplace location relate to commuting by different income groups? Transport Policy, 59, 106–115.

Jensen, O. B., & Richardson, T. (2004). Making European space: Mobility, power and territorial identity. London: Routledge. doi.10.4324/9780203401972

Kenworthy, J. R., & Inbakaran, C. (2011). Differences in transport and land use in thirteen comparable Australian, American, Canadian and European cities between 1995-6 to 2005-6 and their implications for more sustainable transport. Paper presented at the 34th Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF), September 28–30, Adelaide, Australia. Retrieved from

Levinson, D. M., & Kumar, A. (1994). The rational locator: Why travel times have remained stable. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60, 319–332.

Martamo, R. (1995). Työssäkäyntietäisyydet Suomessa (Distance between workplace and residence in Finland). Miljöministeriet, Markanvändingsavdelningen.

Ministry of Transport. (2013). National Transport Plan 2014-2023 (White paper no. 26 [2012-2013]). Oslo: Ministry of Transport. Retrieved from

Mogridge, M. J. H. (1997). The self-defeating nature of urban road capacity policy. A review of theories, disputes and available evidence. Transport Policy, 4(1), 5–23.

Monsen, G. (1983). Bedriftsflytting - endring i arbeidsreise og energiforbruk. Cand. polit. dissertation. Oslo: University of Oslo.

Municipality of Oslo/County of Akershus. (2015). Regional plan for land-use and transport. Retrieved from

Næss, P., & Sandberg, S. L. (1996). Workplace location, modal split and energy use for commuting trips. Urban Studies, 33, 557–580.

Næss, P. (2005). Residential location affects travel behavior – but how and why? The case of Copenhagen metropolitan area. Progress in Planning, 63, 167–257.

Næss, P. (2007). The impacts of job and household decentralization on commuting distances and travel modes: Experiences from the Copenhagen region and other Nordic urban areas. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 2(3), 149–168. Retrieved from;jsessionid=E9BCA4FC0DE64A6F23DEF0CB7EC7E3CE.live11292?__blob=publicationFile&v=2

Næss, P. (2011). New urbanism or metropolitan-level centralization? A comparison of the influences of metropolitan-level and neighborhood-level urban form characteristics on travel behavior. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 4(1), 25–44.

Næss, P. (2013). Residential location, transport rationales and daily-life travel behavior: The case of Hangzhou Metropolitan Area, China. Progress in Planning, 79(1), 1–50.

Næss, P. (2018). Validating explanatory qualitative research: Enhancing the interpretation of interviews in urban planning and transportation research. Applied Mobilities.

Næss, P., Peters, S., Stefansdottir, H., & Strand, A. (2018). Causality, not just correlation: Residential location, transport rationales and travel behavior across metropolitan contexts. Journal of Transport Geography, 69, 181–195.

Næss, P., Tønnesen, A., & Wolday, F. (2019a). How and why does polycentric workplace location within a metropolitan area affect car commuting? Sustainability, 11(4), 1196.

Næss, P., Strand, A., Wolday, F., & Stefansdottir, H. (2019b). Residential location, commuting and non-work travel in two urban areas of different size and with different center structures. Progress in Planning, 128, 1–36.

Scheurer, J. (2014). A comparison of public transport and land use integration in 12 European cities. Presentation at the NMBU Urban Sustainability research group seminar, Ås, September 11, 2014.

Schwanen, T., Dieleman, F. M., & Diest, M. (2001). Travel behavior in Dutch monocentric and polycentric urban systems. Journal of Transport Geography, 9, 173–186.

Sprumont, F., & Viti, F. (2018). The effect of workplace relocation on individuals’ activity travel behavior. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1), 985–1002.

Statistics Norway. (2019a). Population statistics. Retrieved from

Statistics Norway. (2019b). Urban population and land-use statistics. Retrieved from

Strømmen, K. (2001). Rett virksomhet på rett sted – om virksomheters transportskapende egenskaper. Doctoral dissertation. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Technology and Science.

Vale, D. (2013). Does commuting time tolerance impede sustainable urban mobility? Analyzing the impacts on commuting behavior as a result of workplace relocation to a mixed-use center in Lisbon. Journal of Transport Geography, 32, 38–48.

Vale, D., Pereira, M., & Viana, C. M. (2018). Different destination, different commuting pattern? Analyzing the influence of the campus location on commuting. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1), 1–18.

Verroen, E. J., Jong, M. A., Korver, W., & Jansen, B. (1990). Mobility profiles of businesses and other bodies (Report INRO-VVG 1990-03). Delft, The Netherlands: Institute of Spatial Organization TNO.

Yang, J. (2005). Commuting impacts of spatial decentralization: A comparison of Atlanta and Boston. Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 35, 69–78. Retrieved from




How to Cite

Wolday, F., Naess, P., & Tønnesen, A. (2019). Workplace location, polycentricism, and car commuting. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 12(1), 785-810.