Published
2021-07-26
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Hana Sevcikova, Brice Nichols
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JTLU agree to the following terms: 1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. 3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Land use uncertainty in transportation forecast
Hana Sevcikova
Brice Nichols
Puget Sound Regional Council
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2021.1853
Keywords: uncertainty, integrated land use and travel forecast, Bayesian melding, UrbanSim, SoundCast, agent-based models, PSRC
Abstract
Using an integrated land use and travel model system implemented for the Puget Sound region in Washington state, a Bayesian Melding technique is applied to represent variations in land use outcomes, and is propagated into travel choices across a multi-year agent-based simulation. A scenario is considered where zoned capacity is increased around light rail stations. Samples are drawn from the posterior distribution of households to generate travel model inputs. They allow for propagation of land use uncertainty into travel choices, which are themselves assessed for uncertainty by comparing against observed data. Resulting travel measures of zonal vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per capita and light rail station boardings indicate the importance of comparing distributions rather than point forecasts. Results suggest decreased VMT per capita in zones near light rail stations and increased boardings at certain stations with existing development, and less significant impacts around stations with lower initial development capacity. In many cases, individual point level comparisons of scenarios would lead to very different conclusions. Altogether, this finding adds to a line of work demonstrating the policy value of incorporating uncertainty in integrated models and provides a method for assessing these variations in a systematic way.
References
Bowman, J. and M. Bradley. 2014. SoundCast activity-based travel forecasting model for PSRC: Model system design. Puget Sound Regional Council. URL https://www.psrc.org/sites/default/ files/soundcastdesign2014.pdf.
Castiglione, J., M. Bradley, and J. Gliebe. 2015. Activity-based travel demand models: A primer. Second Strategic Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board.
Clay, M. and R. Johnston. 2006. Multivariate uncertainty analysis of an integrated land use and transportation model: MEPLAN. Transportation Research Part D, 11(3):191 – 203.
Conway, M. W., A. Byrd, and M. van Eggermond. 2018. Accounting for uncertainty and variation inaccessibility metrics for public transport sketch planning. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11:541–558. URL https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1074/.
de Jong et al., G. 2005. Uncertainty in traffic forecasts: Literature review and new results for the Netherlands. Technical Report WR-268-AVV, Rand Corporation.
Duthie, J., A. Voruganti, K. M. Kockelman, and S. T. Waller. 2010. Uncertainty analysis and its impact on decision-making in an integrated transportation and gravity-based land use model. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 136(4):294–302.
Felsenstein, D., K. Axhausen, and P. Waddell. 2010. Land use-transportation modeling with Urbansim: Experiences and progress. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 3(2). URL https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v3i2.183.
Flyvbjerg, B. 2005. Measuring inaccuracy in travel demand forecasting: methodological considerations regarding ramp up and sampling. Transportation Research Part A, 39:522–530.
Flyvbjerg, B., N. Bruzelius, and W. Rothengatter. 2003. Megaprojects and Risk. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Flyvbjerg, B., M. K. S. Holm, and S. L. Buhl. 2005. How (in)accurate are demand forecasts in public works projects? The case of transportation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2):131–146.
Gibb, J. and J. Bowman. 2007. Convergence of an activity-based travel model system to equilibrium: Experimental designs and findings. In 11th National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Hartgen, D. T. 2013. Hubris or humility? Accuracy issues for the next 50 years of travel demand modeling. Transportation, 40:1133–1157. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9497-y. Hugosson, M.B. 2005. Quantifying uncertainties in a national forecasting model. Transportation Research Part A, 39:531–547.
Kockelman, K. M. 2002. Uncertainty propagation in an integrated land use-transport modeling framework: Output variation via UrbanSim. Transportation Research Record, (1805):128–135.
Kockelman, K. M. 2003. Propagation of uncertainty in transportation-land use models: An investigation of DRAM-EMPAL and UTPP predictions in Austin, Texas. Transportation Research Record, (1831):219–229.
Pontius Jr, R. G. and J. Spencer. 2005. Uncertainty in extrapolations of predictive land-change models. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32:211–230.
Poole, D. and A. E. Raftery. 2000. Inference for deterministic simulation models: the Bayesian melding approach. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(452):1244–1255.
Pradhan, A. and K. M. Kockelman. 2002. Uncertainty propagation in an integrated land use- transportation modeling framework - output variation via UrbanSim. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1805(1):140–150.
Puget Sound Regional Council. 2018. The Regional Transportation Plan. URL https://www.psrc.org/sites/default/files/rtp-may2018.pdf.
Raftery, A. E., G. H. Givens, and J. E. Zeh. 1992. Inference from a deterministic population dynamics model about bowhead whale, balaena mysticetus, replacement yield. Technical Report 232, Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
Raftery, A. E., G. H. Givens, and J. E. Zeh. 1995. Inference from a deterministic population dynamics model for bowhead whales. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430):402–416.
Rodier, C. J. 2005. Verifying the Accuracy of Land Use Models Used in Transportation and Air Quality Planning: A Case Study in the Sacramento, California Region. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California Davis. URL transweb.sjsu.edu/MTIportal/research/publications/summary/0502.html.
Salling, K. B. and D. Banister. 2009. Assessment of large transport infrastructure projects: e CBA-DK model. Transportation Research Part A, 43:800–813.
Ševčíková, H., A. Raftery, and P. Waddell. 2007. Assessing uncertainty in urban simulations using Bayesian melding. Transportation Research B, 41:652–669.
Ševčíková, H., A. Raftery, and P. Waddell. 2011. Uncertain benefits: Application of Bayesian melding to the Alaskan Way Viaduct in Seattle. Transportation Research A, 45:540–553.
Ševčíková, H., M. Simonson, and M. Jensen. 2015. Assessing and integrating uncertainty into land use forecasting. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 8(3):5–70. URL https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.614.
Sumalee, A., P. Luathep, W. H. K. Lam, and R. D. Connors. 2009. Evaluation and design of transport network capacity under demand uncertainty. Network Modeling, 1:17–28.
Tayman, J. 1996. e accuracy of small-area population forecasts based on a spatial interaction land use modeling system. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(1):85–98. doi: 10.1080/01944369608975672.
Tayman, J. 2009. Uncertainty in Socioeconomic Modeling Systems: Assessment and Recommendations. Maricopa Association of Governments, Phoenix, AZ. URL http://www.azmag.gov/Documents/IS_2009-06-05_Socioeconomic-Modeling_Uncertainty-White-Paper.pdf.
Tayman, J. 2011. Assessing uncertainty in small area forecasts: State of the practice and implementation strategy. Population Research and Policy Review, 30:781–800. doi: 10.1007/s11113-011- 9210-9.
Waddell, P. 2002. UrbanSim: Modeling urban development for land use, transportation, and environmental planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3):297–314.
Waddell, P. 2007. Accessibility and residential location: the interaction of workplace, housing tenure, residential mobility and location choice. In J. Preston, F. Pagliara, and D. Simmonds, eds., Modelling Residential Location Choice. Ashgate. In press.
Waddell, P. 2010. Modeling residential location in UrbanSim. In J. Preston, F. Pagliara, and D. Simmonds, eds., Modelling Residential Location Choice, pp. 165–180. Springer.
Waddell, P. 2011. Integrated land use and transportation planning and modeling: Addressing challenges in research and practice. Transport Reviews, 31(2):209–229.
Waddell, P., H. Ševčíková, D. Socha, E. Miller, and K. Nagel. 2005. Opus: An Open Platform for Urban Simulation. Presented at the Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management Conference, London.
Waddell, P., L. Wang, H. Ševčíková, and A. Borning. 2015. Agile modeling: Adapting UrbanSim to the European context using the Open Platform for Urban Simulation. In M. Bierlaire, A. de Palma, R. Hurtubia, and P. Waddell, eds., Integrated Transport and Land Use Modeling for Sustainable Cities, chapter 16. Routledge.
Wang, G. and K. M. Kockelman. 2018. Three methods for anticipating and understanding uncertainty of outputs from transportation and land use models. Transportation Research Record, 2672:12–22.
Yang, L. and Y. Guo. 2019. Combining pre- and post-model information in the uncertainty quantification of non-deterministic models using an extended Bayesian melding approach. Information Sciences, 502:146–163. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.06.029.
Zhao, Y. and K. M. Kockelman. 2002. The propagation of uncertainty through travel demand models: An exploratory analysis. Annals of Regional Science, 36(2):145–163.
