Modelling children’s independent territorial range by discretionary and nondiscretionary trips
Keywords:Territorial range, children independent mobility, space syntax, built environment, perception of local environment
The decline of children’s independent mobility (CIM) is now a global concern. This study aims to identify the determinants of the territorial range (TR) of CIM, i.e., the geographical distance between home and places where children are allowed to wander. TR for both discretionary and nondiscretionary trips is studied based on data collected through a questionnaire survey, travel diary, and mapping of travel routes. The study sample was comprised of 151 children 9-14 years of age from Dhaka, Bangladesh. Built environment (BE) data were collected/derived through walkability audits of children’s walking routes and spatial analyses. Children’s TR was regressed by BE, socio-demographics, and perceptual factors. Three multiple regression models were estimated: overall TR, discretionary TR, and nondiscretionary TR. Results showed that children had a longer TR for nondiscretionary trips (664.14 m) compared to discretionary trips (397.9 m). Discretionary TR was largely explained by angular step-depth, street connectivity and the condition of the walking environment of the taken routes. In contrast, angular step-depth, the presence of commercial and retail land uses and the condition of the walking environment were found to be significant predictors of nondiscretionary TR. Children’s perception of social and physical dangers and their satisfaction with tree coverage in the neighborhood also influenced their TR. The findings can inform measures to be taken to expand TR in the urban environment.
Alparone, F. R., & Pacilli, M. G. (2012). On children's independent mobility: The interplay of demographic, environmental, and psychosocial factors. Children's Geographies, 10(1), 109–122.
Argin, G., & Torun, A. O. (2015). Walking to school: The effects of street network configuration and urban design qualities on route selection behavior of elementary school students. Paper presented at the 10th International Space Syntax Symposium, July 2015, London.
Badland, H. M., Opit, S., Witten, K., Kearns, R. A., & Mavoa, S. (2010). Can virtual streetscape audits reliably replace physical streetscape audits? Journal of Urban Health, 87(6), 1007–1016.
BCA (Building Construction Act). (2008). Building Construction Act RAJUK 2008. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/PriodeepChowdhury/dhaka-imaratnirmanbidhimala2008
Boldemann, C., Blennow, M., Dal, H., Mårtensson, F., Raustorp, A., Yuen, K., & Wester, U. (2006). Impact of preschool environment upon children's physical activity and sun exposure. Preventive Medicine, 42(4), 301–308.
Bwire, H. (2011). Children's independent mobility and perceptions of outdoor environments in Dar Es Salaam City, Tanzania. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(3), 185–206.
Can, I., & Heath, T. (2016). In-between spaces and social interaction: A morphological analysis of Izmir using space syntax. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31(1), 31–49.
Carver, A., Panter, J. R., Jones, A. P., & van Sluijs, E. M. (2014). Independent mobility on the journey to school: A joint cross-sectional and prospective exploration of social and physical environmental influences. Journal of Transport & Health, 1(1), 25–32. http://doi:10.1016/j.jth.2013.12.003
Chin, G. K. W., Van Niel, K. P., Giles-Corti, B., & Knuiman, M. (2008). Accessibility and connectivity in physical activity studies: The impact of missing pedestrian data. Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 41–45.
Collins, D. C. A., & Kearns, R. A. (2001). The safe journeys of an enterprising school: Negotiating landscapes of opportunity and risk. Health and Place, 7(4), 293–306. http://doi:10.1016/S1353-8292(01)00021-1
Connolly, K., & Bruner, J. (1974). The growth of competence (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.
De Meester, F., Van Dyck, D., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., & Cardon, G. (2014). Parental perceived neighborhood attributes: Associations with active transport and physical activity among 10- to 12-year-old children and the mediating role of independent mobility. BMC Public Health, 14(1), 631. http://doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-631
Fagan-Watson, B., Shaw, B., Bicket, M., Mocca, E., Elliott, B., & Hillman, M. (2015). Children’s independent mobility: An international comparison and recommendations for action. London: Policy Studies Institute.
Fagerholm, N. C. & Broberg, A. (2011). Mapping and characterizing children’s daily mobility in urban residential areas in Turku, Finland. Fennia-International Journal of Geography, 189(2), 31–46.
Fyhri, A., Hjorthol, R., Mackett, R. L., Fotel, T. N., & Kyttä, M. (2011). Children's active travel and independent mobility in four countries: Development, social contributing trends and measures. Transport Policy, 18(5), 703–710.
Gershuny, J. (1993). Escorting children: Impact on parental lifestyle. In Children, transport and the quality of life (pp. 62–76). London: Policy Studies Institute.
Ghekiere, A., Deforcheab, B., Carver, A., Mertens, L., de Geus, B. Clarys, P., . . . Van Cauwenberg, J. (2016). Insights into children’s independent mobility for transportation cycling—which socio-ecological factors matter? Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 20(3), 267–272.
Helbich, M, van Emmichoven, M. J. Z., Dijst, M. J., Kwan, M.-P., Pierik, F. H., & de Vries, S. I. (2016). Natural and built environmental exposures on children's active school travel: A Dutch global positioning system-based cross-sectional study. Health & Place, 39, 101–109.
Hillier, B. (1998). A note on the intuiting of form: Three issues in the theory of design. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design Anniversary Issue, 25(7), 37–40.
Hillier, B. (2007). Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. London: Space Syntax, UCL.
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space, 1984. Cambridge, UK: Press syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Hillier, B., & Iida, S. (2005). Network and psychological effects in urban movement. Paper presented at the International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, Berlin.
Hillman, M., Adams, J., & Whitelegg, J. (1990). One false move. London: Policy Studies Institute.
Jansen-Osmann, P., & Wiedenbauer, G. (2004). The influence of turns on distance cognition: New experimental approaches to clarify the route-angularity effect. Environment and Behavior, 36(6), 790–813.
Lee, C., Kim, H. J., Dowdy, D. M., Hoelscher, D. M., & Ory, M. G. (2013). TCOPPE school environmental audit tool: Assessing safety and walkability of school environments. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 10(7), 949–960.
Loebach, J. E., & Gilliland, J. A. (2014). Free range Kids? Using GPS-derived activity spaces to examine childrens neighborhood activity and mobility. Environment and Behavior, 48(3), 421–453. http://doi:10.1177/0013916514543177
Lopes, F., Cordovil, R., & Neto, C. (2014). Children’s independent mobility in Portugal: Effects of urbanization degree and motorized modes of travel. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 210–219. http://doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.10.002
McDonald, N. C., & Aalborg, A. E. (2009). Why parents drive children to school: Implications for safe routes to school programs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(3), 331–342.
Mitra, R., Faulkner, G. E. J., Buliung, R. N., & Stone, M. R. (2014). Do parental perceptions of the neighborhood environment influence children’s independent mobility? Evidence from Toronto, Canada. Urban Studies, 0042098013519140.
Monsur, M., & Islam, Z. (2011). Impact of street design on children's independent mobility in Dhaka city. Paper presented at the Emergent Placemaking, Seattle, WA.
Monsur, M., Mansur, M., & Islam, M. Z. (2017). Are children living on dead-end streets more active? Near-home street patterns and school-going children's time spent outdoors in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Preventive Medicine, 103, S73–S80.
Moore, R., & Young, D. (1978). Childhood outdoors: Toward a social ecology of the landscape. In Children and the Environment (pp 83–130). New York: Plenum Publishing.
Ozbil, A., Argin, G., & Yesiltepe, D. (2016). Pedestrian route choice by elementary school students: The role of street network configuration and pedestrian quality attributes in walking to school. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 4(2), 67–84.
Özbil Torun, A. (2015). Walking to school: The effects of street network configuration and urban design qualities on route selection behavior of elementary school students. Paper presented at the 10th International Space Syntax Symposium, July 2105, London.
Page, A. S, Cooper, A. R., Griew, P., & Jago, R. (2010). Independent mobility, perceptions of the built environment and children's participation in play, active travel and structured exercise and sport: The PEACH Project. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 7(1), 1.
Prezza, M., Alparone, F. R., Cristallo, C., & Luigi, S. (2005). Parental perception of social risk and of positive potentiality of outdoor autonomy for children: The development of two instruments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 437–453.
Prezza, M., Alparone, F. R., Renzi, D., & Pietrobono, A. (2009). Social participation and independent mobility in children: The effects of two implementations of “we go to school alone.” Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 38(1), 8–25.
Prezza, M., Pilloni, S., Morabito, C., Sersante, C., Alparone, F. R., & Giuliani, M. V. (2001). The influence of psychosocial and environmental factors on children's independent mobility and relationship to peer frequentation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 11(6), 435–450. http://doi:10.1002/casp.643
Ratti, C. (2004). Space syntax: Some inconsistencies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(4), 487–499.
Saelens, B. E., & Handy, S. L. (2008). Built environment correlates of walking: A review. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 40(7), S550.
Sallis, J. F., Cain, K. L., Conway, T. L., Gavand, K. A., Millstein, R. A., Geremia, C. M., . . . King, A. C. (2015). Peer reviewed: Is your neighborhood designed to support physical activity? A brief streetscape audit tool. Preventing Chronic Disease, 12, e141.
Schoeppe, S., Duncan, M. J., Badland, H. M., Rebar, A. L., & Vandelanotte, C. (2016). Too far from home? Adult attitudes on children's independent mobility range. Children's Geographies, 14(4), 482–489.
Sharmin, S., & Kamruzzaman, Md. (2017). Association between the built environment and children's independent mobility: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Transport Geography, 61, 104–117.
Sharmin, S., & Kamruzzaman, Md. (2018a). The impacts of syntactic measures on pedestrian movement: A comparative meta-analytic review between developing and developed countries. Paper presented at the State of Australian Cities Conference, November 2017, Adelaide, Australia.
Sharmin, S., & Kamruzzaman, Md. (2018b). Meta-analysis of the relationships between space syntax measures and pedestrian movement. Transport Reviews, 38(4), 524–550.
Sharmin, S., Kamruzzaman, Md., & Haque, Md. M. (2020). The impact of topological properties of built environment on children independent mobility: A comparative study between discretionary vs. nondiscretionary trips in Dhaka. Journal of Transport Geography, 83, 102660.
Shaw, B., Watson, B., Frauendienst, B., Redecker, A., Jones, T., & Hillman, M. (2013). Children's independent mobility: A comparative study in England and Germany (1971-2010). London: Policy Studies Institute.
Spilsbury, J. C. (2005). ‘We don't really get to go out in the front yard’—children's home range and neighborhood violence. Children's Geographies, 3(1), 79–99.
Timperio, A., Crawford, D., Telford, A., & Salmon, J. (2004). Perceptions about the local neighborhood and walking and cycling among children. Preventive Medicine, 38(1), 39–47.
Tranter, P., & Doyle, J. (1996). Reclaiming the residential street as play space. International Play Journal, 4, 81–97.
Tranter, P., & Pawson, E. (2001). Children's access to local environments: A case-study of Christchurch, New Zealand. Local Environment, 6(1), 27–48.
Tranter, P., & Whitelegg, J. (1994). Children's travel behaviors in Canberra: Car-dependent lifestyles in a low-density city. Journal of Transport Geography, 2(4), 265–273. http://doi:10.1016/0966-6923(94)90050-7
U.S. Environmental Protection, Agency. (2003). Travel and environmental implications of school siting [electronic resource]. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/travel-and-environmental-implications-school-siting
Van Vliet, W. (1983). Exploring the fourth environment: An examination of the home range of city and suburban teenagers. Environment and Behavior, 15(5), 567–588.
Veitch, J., Salmon, J., & Ball, K. (2008). Children's active free play in local neighborhoods: A behavioral mapping study. Health Education Research, 23(5), 870–879.
Villanueva, K., Giles-Corti, B., Bulsara, M., McCormack, G. R., Timperio, A., Middleton, N., . . . Trapp, G. (2012). How far do children travel from their homes? Exploring children's activity spaces in their neighborhood. Health Place, 18(2), 263–273.
Villanueva, K., Giles-Corti, B., Bulsara, M., Timperio, A., McCormack, G., Beesley, B., . . . Middleton, N. (2012). Where do children travel to and what local opportunities are available? The relationship between neighborhood destinations and children's independent mobility. Environment and Behavior, 45(6), 679–705. http://doi:10.1177/0013916512440705
Villanueva, K., Giles-Corti, B., Bulsara, M., Trapp, G., Timperio, A., McCormack, G., & Van Niel, K. (2013). Does the walkability of neighborhoods affect children's independent mobility, independent of parental, socio-cultural and individual factors? Children's Geographies, 12(4), 393–411. http://doi:10.1080/14733285.2013.812311
Xia, X. (2013). A comparison study on a set of space syntax based methods: Applying metric, topological and angular analysis to natural streets, axial lines and axial segments. (Masters thesis), University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden.
Zdrahalova, J., & Boumova, I. (2016). Social and environmental factors influencing active school transport (AST) in Radotin, Prague. Paper presented at the Smart Cities Symposium Prague (SCSP) 2016.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Samia Sharmin, Liton Kamruzzaman, Md. Mazharul Haque
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JTLU agree to the following terms: 1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. 3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.