Journal of Transport and Land Use

The nonlinear impact of cycling environment on bicycle distance: A perspective combining objective and perceptual dimensions

Yantang Zhang

School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology

Xiaowei Hu

School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2024.2434

Keywords: Cycling distance, Cycling environment, Land use, Perception, Non-linearity

---

Abstract

Extending cycling distances is crucial for sustainable urban transport development and plays a role in encouraging the shift from motorized vehicles to public transport. However, there is a lack of research examining the combined impacts of both objective and perceived aspects of the cycling environment on cycling distance, and the existence of threshold effects remains unclear. This study uses 2019 cycling data from Shenzhen, China, employing the XGBoost algorithm to uncover the relative importance and thresholds of objective and perceived factors in the cycling environment. The results indicate that population density (24.8%), road network density (15.2%), the proportion of recreational facilities (9.1%), perceived accessibility (8.0%), and comfort (8.6%) hold high relative importance in predicting cycling distance. Also, maintaining road network density between 3 to 6 km/km2 and increasing the population density to exceed 22,000 people/km2 proves effective in extending cycling distances. Land use demonstrates a threshold effect, with cycling distances increasing when the recreational facilities share exceeds 8%, transport facilities share remains below 25%, and commercial facilities share stays below 30%. Perceived metrics exhibit a clear threshold effect. The study identifies that perceived safety indicates a psychological bottleneck in increasing cycling distance. Perceived accessibility is positively correlated with cycling distance when accessibility is at a low level, while comfort shows a positive correlation with cycling distance when comfort is at a high level. These findings can contribute to refining land planning and prioritizing resource allocation for organizations aiming to promote non-motorized travel and design bicycle-friendly environments.

---

References

Alcorn, L. G., & Jiao, J. (2023). Bike-sharing station usage and the surrounding built environments in major Texas cities. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 43(1), 122–135.

Banerjee, A., Łukawska, M., Jensen, A. F., & Haustein, S. (2022). Facilitating bicycle commuting beyond short distances: Insights from existing literature. Transport Reviews, 42(4), 526–550.

Büchel, B., Marra, A. D., & Corman, F. (2022). COVID-19 as a window of opportunity for cycling: Evidence from the first wave. Transport Policy, 116, 144–156.

Cervero, R., & Duncan, M. (2003). Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1478–1483.

Chan, E. T., Schwanen, T., & Banister, D. (2021). The role of perceived environment, neighbourhood characteristics, and attitudes in walking behaviour: Evidence from a rapidly developing city in China. Transportation, 48, 431–454.

Chataway, E. S., Kaplan, S., Nielsen, T. A. S., & Prato, C. G. (2014). Safety perceptions and reported behavior related to cycling in mixed traffic: A comparison between Brisbane and Copenhagen. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 23, 32–43.

Chen, J., Zhou, D., Zhao, Y., Wu, B., & Wu, T. (2020). Life cycle carbon dioxide emissions of bike sharing in China: Production, operation, and recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162, 105011.

Chen, X. (2022). Predicting college students’ bike-sharing intentions based on the theory of planned behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 836983.

Chen, E., & Ye, Z. (2021). Identifying the nonlinear relationship between free-floating bike sharing usage and built environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124281.

Chen, P., Sun, F., Wang, Z., Gao, X., Jiao, J., & Tao, Z. (2018). Built environment effects on bike crash frequency and risk in Beijing. Journal of Safety Research, 64, 135–143.

Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016, August). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794.

Chen, Z., Van Lierop, D., & Ettema, D. (2022). Dockless bike-sharing’s impact on mode substitution and influential factors. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 15(1), 71–93.

Cheng, L., Wang, K., De Vos, J., Huang, J., & Witlox, F. (2022). Exploring non-linear built environment effects on the integration of free-floating bike-share and urban rail transport: A quantile regression approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 162, 175–187.

Ding, C., Cao, X., Dong, M., Zhang, Y., & Yang, J. (2019). Non-linear relationships between built environment characteristics and electric-bike ownership in Zhongshan, China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 75, 286–296.

Echiburú, T., Muñoz, J. C., & Hurtubia, R. (2021). The role of perceived satisfaction and the built environment on the frequency of cycle-commuting. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 14(1), 171–196.

Elith, J., Leathwick, J. R., & Hastie, T. (2008). A working guide to boosted regression trees. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77(4), 802–813.

Feng, P., & Li, W. (2016). Willingness to use a public bicycle system: An example in NanJing City. Journal of Public Transportation, 19(1), 84–96.

Ferenchak, N. N., & Marshall, W. E. (2021). Bicycling facility inequalities and the causality dilemma with socioeconomic/sociodemographic change. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 97, 102920.

Fitch, D. T., Carlen, J., & Handy, S. L. (2022). What makes bicyclists comfortable? Insights from a visual preference survey of casual and prospective bicyclists. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 155, 434–449.

Galster, G. C. (2018). Nonlinear and threshold effects related to neighborhood: Implications for planning and policy. Journal of Planning Literature, 33(4), 492–508.

Garrard, J., Rose, G., & Lo, S. K. (2008). Promoting transportation cycling for women: The role of bicycle infrastructure. Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 55–59.

Golledge, R. G. (1997). Spatial behavior: A geographic perspective. New York: Guilford Press.

Guo, X., Tavakoli, A., Angulo, A., Robartes, E., Chen, T. D., & Heydarian, A. (2023). Psycho-physiological measures on a bicycle simulator in immersive virtual environments: How protected/curbside bike lanes may improve perceived safety. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 92, 317–336.

Guo, Y., & He, S. Y. (2021). Perceived built environment and dockless bikeshare as a feeder mode of metro. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 92, 102693.

Han, Y., Li, W., Wei, S., & Zhang, T. (2018). Research on passenger’s travel mode choice behavior waiting at bus station based on SEM-logit integration Model. Sustainability, 10(6), 1996.

Ji, S., Wang, X., Lyu, T., Liu, X., Wang, Y., Heinen, E., & Sun, Z. (2022). Understanding cycling distance according to the prediction of the XGBoost and the interpretation of SHAP: A non-linear and interaction effect analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 103, 103414.

Jiao, J., Lee, H. K., & Choi, S. J. (2022). Impacts of COVID-19 on bike-sharing usages in Seoul, South Korea. Cities, 130, 103849.

Kabak, M., Erbaş, M., Cetinkaya, C., & Özceylan, E. (2018). A GIS-based MCDM approach for the evaluation of bike-share stations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 49–60.

Keppner, V., Krumpoch, S., Kob, R., Rappl, A., Sieber, C. C., Freiberger, E., & Siebentritt, H. M. (2023). Safer cycling in older age (SiFAr): Effects of a multi-component cycle training. A randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatrics, 23(1), 1–9.

Kerr, J., Emond, J. A., Badland, H., Reis, R., Sarmiento, O., Carlson, J., ... & Natarajan, L. (2016). Perceived neighborhood environmental attributes associated with walking and cycling for transport among adult residents of 17 cities in 12 countries: The IPEN study. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124(3), 290–298.

Kim, D. J., Shin, H., Im, H., and Park, J. (2012). Factors influencing travel behaviors in bikesharing. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board’s 91st Annual Meeting, January 22–26, Washington, DC.

Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2023). Determining factors affecting public bike ridership and its spatial change before and after COVID-19. Travel Behavior and Society, 31, 24–36.

Kraus, S., & Koch, N. (2021). Provisional COVID-19 infrastructure induces large, rapid increases in cycling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15), e2024399118.

Li, Q., & Xu, W. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on bike-sharing travel pattern and flow structure: Evidence from Wuhan. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 15(3), 477–494.

Ma, L., Dill, J., & Mohr, C. (2014). The objective versus the perceived environment: what matters for bicycling? Transportation, 41, 1135–1152.

Mandic, S., Williams, J., Moore, A., Hopkins, D., Flaherty, C., Wilson, G., ... & Spence, J. C. (2016). Built environment and active transport to school (BEATS) study: Protocol for a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 6(5), e011196.

Marshall, W. E., & Ferenchak, N. N. (2019). Why cities with high bicycling rates are safer for all road users. Journal of Transport & Health, 13, 100539.

Milakis, D., Efthymiou, D., & Antoniou, C. (2017). Built environment, travel attitudes and travel behavior: Quasi-longitudinal analysis of links in the case of Greeks relocating from US to Greece. Sustainability, 9(10), 1774.

Nielsen, T. A. S., Olafsson, A. S., Carstensen, T. A., & Skov-Petersen, H. (2013). Environmental correlates of cycling: Evaluating urban form and location effects based on Danish micro-data. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 22, 40–44.

Ospina, J. P., Botero-Fernández, V., Duque, J. C., Brussel, M., & Grigolon, A. (2020). Understanding cycling travel distance: The case of Medellin City (Colombia). Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 86, 102423.

Porter, A. K., Kohl III, H. W., Pérez, A., Reininger, B., Gabriel, K. P., & Salvo, D. (2020). Bikeability: Assessing the objectively measured environment in relation to recreation and transportation bicycling. Environment and Behavior, 52(8), 861–894.

Pot, F. J., van Wee, B., & Tillema, T. (2021). Perceived accessibility: What it is and why it differs from calculated accessibility measures based on spatial data. Journal of Transport Geography, 94, 103090.

Qiao, S., & Yeh, A. G. O. (2023). Understanding the effects of environmental perceptions on walking behavior by integrating big data with small data. Landscape and Urban Planning, 240, 104879.

Qu, T., Gates, T. J., Xu, C., Seguin, D., & Kay, J. (2022). The disparate impact of COVID-19 pandemic on walking and biking behaviors. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 112, 103494.

Saltykova, K., Ma, X., Yao, L., & Kong, H. (2022). Environmental impact assessment of bike-sharing considering the modal shift from public transit. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 105, 103238.

Samadzad, M., Nosratzadeh, H., Karami, H., & Karami, A. (2023). What are the factors affecting the adoption and use of electric scooter sharing systems from the end user's perspective? Transport Policy, 136, 70–82.

Schaefer, K. J., Tuitjer, L., & Levin-Keitel, M. (2021). Transport disrupted–Substituting public transport by bike or car under Covid 19. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 153, 202–217.

Scheepers, C. E., Wendel-Vos, G. C. W., Van Kempen, E., De Hollander, E., van Wijnen, H. J., Maas, J., ... & Schuit, A. J. (2016). Perceived accessibility is an important factor in transport choice—Results from the AVENUE project. Journal of Transport & Health, 3(1), 96–106.

Shaer, A., Rezaei, M., Rahimi, B. M., & Shaer, F. (2021). Examining the associations between perceived built environment and active travel, before and after the COVID-19 outbreak in Shiraz city, Iran. Cities, 115, 103255.

Shao, Q., Zhang, W., Cao, X. J., & Yang, J. (2022). Nonlinear and interaction effects of land use and motorcycles/e-bikes on car ownership. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 102, 103115.

Shen, Y., Zhang, X., & Zhao, J. (2018). Understanding the usage of dockless bike sharing in Singapore. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(9), 686–700.

Sultana, S., Kim, H., Pourebrahim, N., & Karimi, F. (2018). Geographical assessment of low-carbon transportation modes: A case study from a commuter university. Sustainability, 10(8), 2696.

Sun, G., & Zacharias, J. (2017). Can bicycle relieve overcrowded metro? Managing short-distance travel in Beijing. Sustain, Cities Soc., 35, 323–330.

Wang, K., Akar, G., & Chen, Y. J. (2018). Bike sharing differences among millennials, Gen Xers, and baby boomers: Lessons learnt from New York City’s bike share. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 116, 1–14.

Wei, B., & Zhu, L. (2023). Exploring the impact of built environment factors on the relationships between bike sharing and public transportation: A case study of New York. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(7), 293.

Williams, N. L., Wassler, P., & Ferdinand, N. (2022). Tourism and the COVID-(Mis) infodemic. Journal of Travel Research, 61(1), 214–218.

Winters, M., Teschke, K., Grant, M., Setton, E. M., & Brauer, M. (2010). How far out of the way will we travel? Built environment influences on route selection for bicycle and car travel. Transportation Research Record, 2190(1), 1–10.

Wu, C., Kim, I., & Chung, H. (2021). The effects of built environment spatial variation on bike-sharing usage: A case study of Suzhou, China. Cities, 110, 103063.

Yasir, A., Hu, X., Ahmad, M., Alvarado, R., Anser, M. K., Işık, C., ... & Khan, I. A. (2022). Factors affecting electric bike adoption: Seeking an energy-efficient solution for the post-COVID era. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9, 817107.

Young, E., Kastner, P., Dogan, T., Chokhachian, A., Mokhtar, S., & Reinhart, C. (2022). Modeling outdoor thermal comfort along cycling routes at varying levels of physical accuracy to predict bike ridership in Cambridge, MA. Building and Environment, 208, 108577.

Zhang, Y., Thomas, T., Brussel, M., & Van Maarseveen, M. (2017). Exploring the impact of built environment factors on the use of public bikes at bike stations: Case study in Zhongshan, China. Journal of Transport Geography, 58, 59–70.

Zhang, Y., Kasraian, D., & van Wesemael, P. (2023). Built environment and micro-mobility. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 16(1), 293–317.

Zhao, Y., Ke, S., Lin, Q., & Yu, Y. (2020). Impact of land use on bicycle usage. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 13(1), 299–316.

Zhao, C., Nielsen, T. A. S., Olafsson, A. S., Carstensen, T. A., & Meng, X. (2018). Urban form, demographic and socio-economic correlates of walking, cycling, and e-biking: Evidence from eight neighborhoods in Beijing. Transport Policy, 64, 102–112.

Zhuang, C. G., Li, S. Y., & Tan, Z. Z., Gao, F., & Wu, Z. (2022). Nonlinear and threshold effects of traffic condition and built environment on dockless bike sharing at street level. Journal of Transport Geography, 102, 103375.