Journal of Transport and Land Use

Investigating the impacts of telecommuting on the spatial, temporal, and modal distribution of travel using an agent-based transport simulation model

Bijoy Saha

University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus

Mahmudur Rahman Fatmi

University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus

Nazmul Arefin Khan

Argonne National Laboratory

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2024.2513

Keywords: Agent-based model, Transportation network simulation, Telecommuting, Departure time, Mode choice, Destination choice, Nested model

---

Abstract

Technological advancements over the past few decades have facilitated telecommuting, but its adoption surged significantly when travel restrictions forced workers to work from home during the pandemic. This shift significantly reduced peak-hour traffic flow and congestion, but the impact of this travel demand management strategy on 24-hour travel is not well understood. This study aims to evaluate the impacts of telecommuting on 24-hour traffic flow using an agent-based transport simulator. Methodologically, a nested structure is implemented to generate departure time, mode, and destination choice joint decisions and accommodate inter-dependencies. Given the behavioral differences among different population groups, separate models are implemented for these different groups: commuters, telecommuters, non-workers, students attending school in-person/online. Following the generation of 24-hour activities, activity itineraries are applied within a dynamic agent-based multimodal transport network model using the open-source MATSim platform. This modeling and simulation exercise has been implemented for the entire population of the Okanagan region of British Columbia, Canada. After thorough validation, the simulation results suggest that with the increase in telecommuting population, an increase in all types of non-mandatory travel is predicted to occur near the urban centers during the off-peak hours – resulting in the spreading of the peak over the day.

---

References

Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273

Asgari, H., Jin, X., & Du, Y. (2016). Examination of the impacts of telecommuting on the time use of nonmandatory activities. Transportation Research Record, 2566(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.3141/2566-09

Auld, J., & Mohammadian, A. (2009). Framework for the development of the agent-based dynamic activity planning and travel scheduling (ADAPTS) model. Transportation Letters, 1(3), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.3328/TL.2009.01.03.245-255

Axhausen, K. W., Horni, A., & Nagel, K. (2016). The multi-agent transport simulation MATSim. London: Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/baw

Beck, M. J., & Hensher, D. A. (2020). Insights into the impact of COVID-19 on household travel and activities in Australia – The early days of easing restrictions. Transport Policy, 96, 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.08.004

Bhaduri, E., Manoj, B. S., Wadud, Z., Goswami, A. K., & Choudhury, C. F. (2020). Modelling the effects of COVID-19 on travel mode choice behavior in India. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 8, 100273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100273

Bhat, C. R., Guo, J. Y., Srinivasan, S., & Sivakumar, A. (2004). Comprehensive econometric microsimulator for daily activity-travel patterns. Transportation Research Record, 1894(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.3141/1894-07

Bradley, M., Bowman, J. L., & Griesenbeck, B. (2010). SACSIM: An applied activity-based model system with fine-level spatial and temporal resolution. Journal of Choice Modelling, 3(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70027-7

Budnitz, H., Tranos, E., & Chapman, L. (2020). Telecommuting and other trips: An English case study. Journal of Transport Geography, 85, 102713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102713

Ding, C., Mishra, S., Lin, Y., & Xie, B. (2015). Cross-nested joint model of travel mode and departure time choice for urban commuting trips: Case study in Maryland–Washington, DC, region. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 141(4), 04014036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000238

Elmorssy, M., & Onur, T. H. (2020). Modelling departure time, destination and travel mode choices by using generalized nested logit model: Discretionary trips. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications, 33(2), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.5829/IJE.2020.33.02B.02

Environment and Climate Change Canada. (2020). National inventory report 1990–2020: Greenhouse gas sources and sinks in Canada. Retrieved from https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.506002/publication.html

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2024). GHG Emission Factors Hub. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/ghg-emission-factors-hub

Golshani, N., Shabanpour, R., Mohammadian, A., Auld, J., & Ley, H. (2019). Analysis of evacuation destination and departure time choices for no-notice emergency events. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 15(2), 896–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2018.1546778

Hao, J. Y., Hatzopoulou, M., & Miller, E. J. (2010). Integrating an activity-based travel demand model with dynamic traffic assignment and emission models: Implementation in the greater Toronto, Canada, area. Transportation Research Record, 2176(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3141/2176-01

He, B. Y., Zhou, J., Ma, Z., Wang, D., Sha, D., Lee, M., …, & Ozbay, K. (2021). A validated multi-agent simulation test bed to evaluate congestion pricing policies on population segments by time-of-day in New York City. Transport Policy, 101, 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.12.011

Hörl, S., Balac, M., & Axhausen, K. W. (2018). A first look at bridging discrete choice modeling and agent-based microsimulation in MATSim. Procedia Computer Science, 130, 900–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.087

Khaddar, S., Fatmi, M. R., & Nikodym, T. (2023). Are telecommuters’ and non-telecommuters’ daily time-use behaviors different? An episode-level model for non-mandatory activities. Transportation Research Record, 2677(11), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231164390

Lamondia, J., Snell, T., & Bhat, C. R. (2010). Traveler behavior and values analysis in the context of vacation destination and travel mode choices: European union case study. Transportation Research Record, 2156(1), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.3141/2156-16

Lin, D. Y., Eluru, N., Waller, S. T., & Bhat, C. R. (2008). Integration of activity-based modeling and dynamic traffic assignment. Transportation Research Record, 2076(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.3141/2076-06

Loo, B. P. Y., & Huang, Z. (2022). Spatio-temporal variations of traffic congestion under work from home (WFH) arrangements: Lessons learned from COVID-19. Cities, 124, 103610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103610

Marz, W., & Şen, S. (2022). Does telecommuting reduce commuting emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 116, 102746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2022.102746

Pendyala, R., Konduri, K., Chiu, Y. C., Hickman, M., Noh, H., Waddell, P., …, & Gardner, B. (2012). Integrated land use-transport model system with dynamic time-dependent activity-travel microsimulation. Transportation Research Record, 2303(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.3141/2303-03

Pendyala, R. M., Kitamura, R., Kikuchi, A., Yamamoto, T., & Fujii, S. (2005). Florida activity mobility simulator overview and preliminary validation results. Transportation Research Record, 1921(1), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.3141/1921-14

Rahman, M. N., & Fatmi, M. R. (2023). Population synthesis accommodating heterogeneity: A Bayesian network and generalized raking technique. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2677(6), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221144289

Rasouli, S., & Timmermans, H. (2014). Activity-based models of travel demand: Promises, progress and prospects. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(1), 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2013.835118

Roorda, M. J., Miller, E. J., & Nurul Habib, K. M. (2008). Validation of TASHA: A 24-h activity scheduling microsimulation model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(2), 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2007.10.004

Saha, B., N. A. Khan, & M. R. Fatmi. (2024). A nested modelling of destination location, departure time and travel mode choice decisions: Telecommuters, commuters and non-workers. Paper presented at the 2024 World Symposium on Transport and Land Use Research (WSTLUR), Bogota, Colombia, June 17–20, 2024.

Shabanpour, R., Golshani, N., Tayarani, M., Auld, J., & Mohammadian, A. K. (2018). Analysis of telecommuting behavior and impacts on travel demand and the environment. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 62, 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.04.003

Victoriano-Habit, R., & El-Geneidy, A. (2023). Studying the interrelationship between telecommuting during COVID-19, residential local accessibility, and active travel: A panel study in Montréal, Canada. Transportation,1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-022-10369-7

Wang, K., Liu, Y., Mashrur, S. M., Loa, P., & Habib, K. N. (2021). Covid-19 influenced households’ interrupted travel schedules (COVHITS) survey: Lessons from the fall 2020 cycle. Transport Policy, 112, 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.08.009

Ziemke, D., Nagel, K., & Bhat, C. (2015). Integrating CEMDAP and MATSIM to increase the transferability of transport demand models. Transportation Research Record, 2493(1), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.3141/2493-13