Modeling active mobility choices in urban spaces: A preface

Louafi Bouzouina

LAET - ENTPE, University of Lyon

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8975-5124

Karima Kourtit

Open University of the Netherlands

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7171-994X

Peter Nijkamp

Open University of the Netherlands

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4068-8132

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2024.2620

Keywords: Bicycling, Walking, Active transportation


Abstract

This note presents the scope and contents of a special collection in the Journal of Transport and Land Use, devoted to the theme of “Modeling Choice Behavior of Cyclists and Pedestrians in Urban Activity Space.” The aim of the special issue is to explore the significance of active transport modes—specifically, cycling and walking—in promoting sustainable urban mobility. In the face of increasing urban mobility demands and the pressing need to meet environmental and climate goals, this collection of studies presents new analytical and empirical insights into the factors influencing cycling and pedestrian behaviors. The research highlights the interplay between infrastructural support, socioeconomic conditions, and user perceptions, providing recommendations for policymakers and urban planners. By examining diverse contexts, from university settings to micromobility patterns in urban centers, the findings presented in this special issue highlight the potential of active transport modes to foster healthier lifestyles and reduce reliance on motorized vehicle use.


References

Allam, Z., Moreno, C., Chabaud, D., & Pratlong, F. (2022). Proximity-based planning and the 15-minute city: A sustainable model for the city of the future. In The Palgrave Handbook of Global Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38948-2_178-1

Arias Molinares, D., Talavera-García, R., Romanillos-Arroyo, G., & García Palomares, J. C. (2024). On the path to develop a micromobility journey planner for Madrid: A tool to estimate, visualize, and analyze cycling and other shared mobility services’ flow. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 17(1), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2024.2451

Bircu, C., Cavallaro, F., Pozzer, G., & Nocera, S. (2024). Exploring the prospects and challenges of sustainable urban mobility: Potential and limits of cycling in Venice. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 17(1), 401–422. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2024.2448

Bleviss, D. (2020). Transportation is critical to reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. WIREs Energy and Environment, 10, e390. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.390

Cavallaro, F., Costa, C., De Biasi, I., Fabio, A., & Nocera, S. (2024). Sustainable pathways for mitigating externalities in long-distance terrestrial transport. Transport Policy, 154, 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.05.026

Chapman, L. (2007). Transport and climate change: A review. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(5), 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.11.008

Cunha, I., & Cadima, C. (2024). Active travel in the university setting: Assessing the effects of social behavior, socioeconomics, and the spatial environment. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 17(1), 707–730. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2024.2473

Dantsuji, T., Sugishita, K., & Fukuda, D. (2023). Understanding changes in travel patterns during the COVID-19 outbreak in the three major metropolitan areas of Japan. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 175, 103762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103762

Davis, M., Stainforth, T., Gvein, M., Troeltzsch, J., & Meysner, A. (2022). Opportunities for health engagement in European climate policies: Scoping study for the EPHA. Retrieved August 15, 2024, from https://www.ecologic.eu/sites/default/files/publication/2022/50113-EPHA-ClimateHealth-ScopingStudy.pdf

Eriksson, L., Friman, M., & Gärling, T. (2013). Perceived attributes of bus and car mediating satisfaction with the work commute. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 47, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.028

Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Eriksson, L., Friman, M., Olsson, L. E., & Fujii, S. (2011). Satisfaction with travel and subjective well-being: Development and test of a measurement tool. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14, 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2010.11.002

European Commission (2018). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions on enabling the digital transformation of health and care in the Digital Single Market; Empowering citizens and building a healthier society. COM(2018) 233 final. Brussels, Belgium. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2018:233:FIN

European Commission. (2019). Sustainable mobility: The European Green Deal. Retrieved August 10, 2024, from https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-themes/mobility-strategy_en

Ferdman, A. (2021). Well-being and mobility: A new perspective. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 146, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.02.003

Guerrero-Ibanez, J.A., Zeadally, S., & Contreras-Castillo, J. (2015). Integration challenges of intelligent transportation systems with connected vehicle, cloud computing, and internet of things technologies. IEEE Wireless Communications, 22(6), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2015.7368833

Havet, N., & Bouzouina, L. (2024). Bicycle use in the university community: Empirical analysis using MobiCampus-UdL data (Lyon, France). Journal of Transport and Land Use, 17(1), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2024.2450

Hong, S., Zhao, F., Livshits, V., Gershenfeld, S., Santos, J., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2021). Insights on data quality from a large-scale application of smartphone-based travel survey technology in the Phoenix metropolitan area, Arizona, USA. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 154, 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.10.002

Kilani, M., Bennaya, S., & Zerguini, S. (2024). Complementarity and substitution between public transport and bicycles. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 17(1), 781–803. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2024.2465

Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., Osth, J., Türk, U. (2024). Slow motion in corona times: Modeling cyclists’ spatial choice behavior using real-time probe data. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 17(1), 805–826. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2024.2398

Lindsey, R., & Santos, G. (2020). Addressing transportation and environmental externalities with economics: Are policy makers listening? Research in Transportation Economics, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100872

Loo, B., & Tsoi, K.H. (2018). The sustainable transport pathway: A holistic strategy of Five Transformations. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1354

Lozzi, G., & Monachino, M.S. (2021). Health considerations in active travel policies: A policy analysis at the EU level and of four member countries. Research in Transportation Economics, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.101006

Low, R., Tekler, Z.D., & Cheah, L. (2020). Predicting commercial vehicle parking duration using generative adversarial multiple imputation networks. Transportation Research Record, 2674, 820–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120932166

Melo, P. C., Ge, J., Craig, T., Brewer, M. J., & Thronicker, I. (2018). Does work-life balance affect pro-environmental behaviour? Evidence for the UK using longitudinal microdata. Ecological Economics, 145, 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.09.006

Molina, J. A., Giménez-Nadal, J. I., & Velilla, J. (2020). Sustainable commuting: Results from a social approach and international evidence on carpooling. Sustainability, 12(22), 9587. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229587

Moreno, C. (2024). The 15-minute city: A solution for saving our time and our planet. John Wiley, New York.

Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C., & Pratlong, F. (2021). Introducing the 15-minute city: Sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities. Smart Cities, 4(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010006

Oladimeji, D., Gupta, K., Kose, N. A., Gundogan, K., Ge, L., & Liang, F. (2023). Smart transportation: An overview of technologies and applications. Sensors, 23(8), 3880. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23083880

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development, United Nations. Retrieved August 29, 2024, from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

van Nijen, N., Ulak, M. B., Veenstra, S., & Geurs, K. (2024). Exploring factors affecting route choice of cyclists: A novel varying-contiguity spatially lagged exogenous modeling approach. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 17(1), 557–577. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2024.2452

van Wee, B., & Ettema, D. (2016). Travel behaviour and health: A conceptual model and research agenda. Journal of Transport and Health, 3(3): 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.07.003

World Bank. (1996). Sustainable transport: Priorities for policy reform. Development in practice. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

World Health Organization. (2005). Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-SDE-PHE-OEH-06-02

Zhang, Y., & Hu, X. (2024). The nonlinear impact of cycling environment on bicycle distance: A perspective combining objective and perceptual dimensions. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 17(1), 241–267. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2024.2434