Journal of Transport and Land Use

Associations of utilitarian cycling with destinations and street connectivity assessed within multiple buffers

Firas Mohamed

Swinburne University of Technology and South Eastern University of Sri Lanka

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1434-275X

Manoj Chandrabose

Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology and Swinburne University of Technology

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5311-3020

Neville Owen

Swinburne University of Technology and Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2784-4820

Takemi Sugiyama

Swinburne University of Technology

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8859-5269

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2025.2673

Keywords: Travel survey, Bicycle use, Physical activity, Environment

---

Abstract

In examining neighborhood environmental attributes associated with bicycle use, measuring attributes within a buffer area around home has been a common approach. However, buffer sizes have been determined with limited empirical support. This study investigated associations of cycling for utilitarian purposes with destinations and street connectivity measured within empirically informed multiple buffer zones. Household travel survey data collected in Victoria, Australia (2012–20), were used to calculate the mode share of cycling for home-based utilitarian trips in 1,105 Statistical Area Level 1s (SA1s), which contained 43,965 adult participants. Based on the distribution of home-based utilitarian cycling trip distances, three non-overlapping concentric circular buffers were drawn from the centroid of each SA1: 0–1 km (Zone 1); 1–1.8 km (Zone 2); and 1.8–4 km (Zone 3). Two destination density measures (core and expanded destinations) and two intersection density measures (3-way+ and 4-way+ intersections) were assessed within each zone. Two-part regression models examined the associations of environmental measures with the presence of utilitarian cycling (logistic regression) and with the mode share of cycling (linear regression). Logistic regression found that higher destination density in all zones and intersection density in Zone 3 were associated with higher odds of utilitarian cycling trips. Linear regression found that higher destination and intersection densities in Zone 2 were associated with a higher mode share of cycling. Future research could use a buffer area within 1 to 4 km from home to further understand the relationships between the built environment and cycling for utilitarian purposes.

---

References

Adam, L., Jones, T., & Te Brömmelstroet, M. (2020). Planning for cycling in the dispersed city: Establishing a hierarchy of effectiveness of municipal cycling policies. Transportation, 47(2), 503–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9878-3

Adams, M. A., Frank, L. D., Schipperijn, J., Smith, G., Chapman, J., Christiansen, L. B., …, & Sallis, J. F. (2014). International variation in neighborhood walkability, transit, and recreation environments using geographic information systems: The IPEN adult study. International Journal of Health Geographics, 13(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-13-43

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2016a). Mesh blocks. Retrieved from https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/1270.0.55.001~July%202016~Main%20Features~Mesh%20Blocks%20(MB)~10012

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2016b). Socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA), Australia. Retrieved from https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/2033.0.55.001

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2016c). Statistical area level 1. Retrieved from https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/1270.0.55.001~July%202016~Main%20Features~Statistical%20Area%20Level%201%20(SA1)~10013

Beenackers, M. A., Foster, S., Kamphuis, C. B. M., Titze, S., Divitini, M., Knuiman, M., …, & Giles-Corti, B. (2012). Taking up cycling after residential relocation: Built environment factors. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 42(6), 610–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.021

Bohannon, R. W., & Andrews, W. (2011). Normal walking speed: A descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy, 97(3), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2010.12.004

Boulton, A. J., & Williford, A. (2018). Analyzing skewed continuous outcomes with many zeros: A tutorial for social work and youth prevention science researchers. Journal of the Society for Social Work & Research, 9(4), 721–740. https://doi.org/10.1086/701235

Brand, C., Dons, E., Anaya-Boig, E., Avila-Palencia, I., Clark, A., de Nazelle, A., . . ., Int Panis, L. (2021). The climate change mitigation effects of daily active travel in cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport & Environment, 93, 102764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102764

Buntin, M. B., & Zaslavsky, A. M. (2004). Too much ado about two-part models and transformation? Comparing methods of modeling Medicare expenditures. Journal of Health Economics, 23(3), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.10.005

Chen, P., Zhou, J., & Sun, F. (2017). Built environment determinants of bicycle volume: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Transport & Land Use, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2017.892

Christiansen, L. B., Cerin, E., Badland, H., Kerr, J., Davey, R., Troelsen, J., … , & Sallis, J. F. (2016). International comparisons of the associations between objective measures of the built environment and transport-related walking and cycling: IPEN adult study. Journal of Transport & Health, 3(4), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.02.010

City of Sydney. (2018). Cycling strategy and action plan. Retrieved from https://www.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/311382/CyclingStrategyActionPlan2018_low-res.pdf

Cole, R., Turrell, G., Koohsari, M. J., Owen, N., & Sugiyama, T. (2017). Prevalence and correlates of walkable short car trips: A cross-sectional multilevel analysis. Journal of Transport & Health, 4, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.11.007

Eriksson, J., Forsman, Å., Niska, A., Gustafsson, S., & Sörensen, G. (2019). An analysis of cyclists’ speed at combined pedestrian and cycle paths. Traffic Injury Prevention, 20(S3), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2019.1658083

Ferretto, L., Bruzzone, F., & Nocera, S. (2021). Pathways to active mobility planning. Research in Transportation Economics, 86, 101027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.101027

Goel, R., Goodman, A., Aldred, R., Nakamura, R., Tatah, L., Garcia, L. M. T., …, & de Nazelle, A. (2022). Cycling behavior in 17 countries across 6 continents: Levels of cycling, who cycles, for what purpose, and how far? Transport Reviews, 42(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1915898

Götschi, T., Garrard, J., & Giles-Corti, B. (2016). Cycling as a part of daily life: A review of health perspectives. Transport Reviews, 36(1), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1057877

Gunn, L. D., King, T. L., Mavoa, S., Lamb, K. E., Giles-Corti, B., & Kavanagh, A. (2017). Identifying destination distances that support walking trips in local neighborhoods. Journal of Transport & Health, 5, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.08.009.

Hagen, O. H., & Rynning, M. K. (2021). Promoting cycling through urban planning and development: A qualitative assessment of bikeability. Urban, Planning & Transport Research, 9(1), 276–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2021.1938195

Higgs, C., Lowe, M., Hooper, P., Mavoa, S., Arundel, J., Gunn, L., …, & Giles-Corti, B. (2023). Policy relevant health related liveability indicator datasets for addresses in Australia’s 21 largest cities. Scientific Data, 10(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02013-5

Hino, A. A. F., Reis, R. S., Sarmiento, O. L., Parra, D. C., & Brownson, R. C. (2014). Built environment and physical activity for transportation in adults from Curitiba, Brazil. Journal of Urban Health, 91(3), 446–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-013-9831-x

Hogg, R. V., Tanis, E. A., & Zimmerman, D. L. (2020). Probability and statistical inference. Hoboken, NJ: USA Pearson Education, Inc.

Holliday, K. M., Howard, A. G., Emch, M., Rodríguez, D. A., & Evenson, K. R. (2017). Are buffers around home representative of physical activity spaces among adults? Health & Place, 45, 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.03.013

Ipsos Social Research Institute. (2017). VISTA 2015 – 2016 technical report. Melbourne, Australia: Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources—Victoria.

Koohsari, M. J., Cole, R., Oka, K., Shibata, A., Yasunaga, A., Hanibuchi, T., …, & Sugiyama, T. (2020). Associations of built environment attributes with bicycle use for transport. Environment & Planning B: Urban Analytics & City Science, 47(9), 1745–1757. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319845006

Lee, A., & March, A. (2010). Recognizing the economic role of bikes: Sharing parking in Lygon Street, Carlton. Australian Planner, 47(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293681003767785

Ma, L., & Dill, J. (2015). Associations between the objective and perceived built environment and bicycling for transportation. Journal of Transport & Health, 2(2), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2015.03.002

Ma, L., Dill, J., & Mohr, C. (2014). The objective versus the perceived environment: What matters for bicycling? Transportation, 41(6), 1135–1152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9520-y

Mavoa, S., Eagleson, S., Badland, H. M., Gunn, L., Boulange, C., Stewart, J., & Giles-Corti, B. (2018). Identifying appropriate land-use mix measures for use in a national walkability index. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1), 681–700. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1132

McNeil, N. (2011). Bikeability and the 20-min neighborhood: How infrastructure and destinations influence bicycle accessibility. Transportation Research Record, 2247, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.3141/2247-07

Mertens, L., Compernolle, S., Deforche, B., Mackenbach, J. D., Lakerveld, J., Brug, J., …, & Van Dyck, D. (2017). Built environmental correlates of cycling for transport across Europe. Health & Place, 44, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.01.007

Millward, H., Spinney, J., & Scott, D. (2013). Active-transport walking behavior: Destinations, durations, distances. Journal of Transport Geography, 28, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.11.012

Mohamed, F., Chandrabose, M., Mohammad Forkan, A. R., Owen, N., & Sugiyama, T. (2024). Variations in cycling distances by trip purpose and socio-demographic attributes: Implications for spatial scales to assess environmental correlates of cycling. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(12), 1648. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21121648

Morency, C., Demers, M., & Poliquin, E. (2014). Shifting short motorized trips to walking: The potential of active transportation for physical activity in Montreal. Journal of Transport & Health, 1, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2014.03.002

Nielsen, T. A. S., Olafsson, A. S., Carstensen, T. A., & Skov-Petersen, H. (2013). Environmental correlates of cycling: Evaluating urban form and location effects based on Danish micro-data. Transportation Research Part D: Transport & Environment, 22, 40–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.02.017

Peeters, G., Dobson, A. J., Deeg, D. J., & Brown, W. J. (2013). A life-course perspective on physical functioning in women. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91, 661–670. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.13.123075

Porter, A. K., Kohl, H. W., Perez, A., Reininger, B., Gabriel, K. P., & Salvo, D. (2020). Bikeability: Assessing the objectively measured environment in relation to recreation and transportation bicycling. Environment & Behavior, 52(8), 861–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518825289

Sallis, J. F., & Owen, N. (2015). Ecological models of health behavior. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice (5th ed., pp. 43–64). Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.

Schneider, F., Jensen, A. F., Daamen, W., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2022). Empirical analysis of cycling distances in three of Europe’s most bicycle-friendly regions within an accessibility framework. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 1(7), 775–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2022.2095945

Smith, G., Gidlow, C., Davey, R., & Foster, C. (2010). What is my walking neighborhood? A pilot study of English adults’ definitions of their local walking neighborhoods. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition & Physical Activity, 7(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-7-34

Song, Y., Preston, J., & Ogilvie, D. (2017). New walking and cycling infrastructure and modal shift in the UK: A quasi-experimental panel study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 95, 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.11.017

Sugiyama, T., Kubota, A., Sugiyama, M., Cole, R., & Owen, N. (2019). Distances walked to and from local destinations: Age-related variations and implications for determining buffer sizes. Journal of Transport & Health, 15, 100621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.100621

Sugiyama, T., Neuhaus, M., Cole, R., Giles-Corti, B., & Owen, N. (2012). Destination and route attributes associated with adults’ walking: A review. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 44(7), 1275–1286. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318247d286

Toomet, O., & Henningsen, A. (2008). Sample selection models in R: Package sample selection. Journal of Statistical Software, 27(7), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v027.i07

Transport for Victoria. (2017). Victorian cycling strategy 2018-28: Increasing cycling for transport. Retrieved from https://content.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-09/Victorian-Cycling-Strategy-2018-28.pdf

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

Urban Transport Institute and I-view Pty Ltd. (2011). Victorian Integrated Survey of Travel & Activity 2009-10–Survey procedures and documentation v1.0. The Victorian Department of Transport.

Yang, Y., Wu, X., Zhou, P., Gou, Z., & Lu, Y. (2019). Towards a cycling-friendly city: An updated review of the associations between built environment and cycling behaviors (2007–2017). Journal of Transport & Health, 14, 100613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.100613