Phantom trips: Overestimating the traffic impacts of new development

Adam Millard-Ball

doi:10.5198/jtlu.2015.384

PDF Phantom Trips supporting information and data

Published

2015-03-05

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2015)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with JTLU agree to the following terms: 1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. 3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

How to Cite

Millard-Ball, A. (2015). Phantom trips: Overestimating the traffic impacts of new development. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 8(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.384

Phantom trips: Overestimating the traffic impacts of new development

Adam Millard-Ball

University of California, Santa Cruz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.384

Keywords: traffic impact analysis, trip generation,

Abstract

The Trip Generation Manual is the standard reference for assessing the impacts of new development on traffic congestion and the environment in the United States. However, a comparison to household surveys suggests that the Trip Generation Manual overestimates trips by 55 percent—likely because its data represent a biased sample of development in the U.S. Moreover, the data in the Trip Generation Manual are ill suited to many analyses of traffic impacts, development impact fees, and greenhouse gas emissions because they do not account for substitution effects. Most trips “generated” by new developments are not new, but instead involve households reshuffling trips from other destinations. These twin problems—theoretical and practical—are likely to lead to the construction of excessive roadway infrastructure and to the overestimation of the congestion, fiscal, and environmental impacts of new development.

Author Biography

Adam Millard-Ball, University of California, Santa Cruz

A