Changes in travel behavior during the transition from secondary to higher education: A case study from Ghent, Belgium

Leen De Paepe; Jonas De Vos; Veronique Van Acker; Frank Witlox

doi:10.5198/jtlu.2018.1113

PDF

Published

2018-07-09

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2018)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with JTLU agree to the following terms: 1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. 3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

How to Cite

De Paepe, L., De Vos, J., Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F. (2018). Changes in travel behavior during the transition from secondary to higher education: A case study from Ghent, Belgium. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1113

Changes in travel behavior during the transition from secondary to higher education: A case study from Ghent, Belgium

Leen De Paepe

Ghent University

Jonas De Vos

Ghent University

Veronique Van Acker

Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER)

Frank Witlox

Ghent University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1113

Keywords: Modal choice, Mobility biographies, Lifestyles, Students, Belgium

Abstract

Over the past few decades, the number of students attending universities and university colleges in Belgium has increased considerably. In many Western countries, this trend is accompanied by a decline in car use among young adults. Therefore, it is important to have better insights into how travel behavior changes during the transition from secondary to higher education. This research fits into the larger framework of mobility biographies, where travel behavior is analyzed over a life course, taking into account certain life events. Hierarchical logistic regressions are used to analyze car use data for mandatory activities (going to school and grocery shopping) and leisure activities (fun shopping) of 404 first-year university and university college students in Ghent (Belgium). The results indicate that holding a driver’s license or owning a car facilitates car use irrespective of students’ residential location and lifestyle, and this is true for all activities. The built environment only seems to become an important factor explaining car use when students are attending university or university college. The influence of lifestyles appears to become somewhat more important for leisure activities, such as fun shopping. The emerging lifestyle of students appears to become more individual and more independent from the lifestyle of others, especially the parents. This is supported by the declining influence of social networks, notably the family.

Author Biographies

Leen De Paepe, Ghent University

Doctoral Researcher and Teaching Assitant at the Department of Geography

Jonas De Vos, Ghent University

Post-doctoral researcher at the Department of Geography

Veronique Van Acker, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER)

Researcher at the Department of Urban Development and Mobility

Frank Witlox, Ghent University

Professor in Social and Economic Geography at the Department of Geography

References

Albrecht, J., Döring, L., Holz-Rau, C., & Scheiner, J. (2014). The relevance of the place of childhood and adolescence for residential choice in later life. A life-course and intergenerational approach. Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.

Bagley, M. N., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2002). The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: A structural equations modelling approach. The Annals of Regional Science, 36(2), 279–297.

Baslington, H. (2008). Travel socialization: A social theory of travel mode behavior. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2(2), 91–114.

Beige, S., & Axhausen, K. W. (2006). Long-term mobility decisions during the life course: Experiences with a 20 retrospective survey. Zürich: Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule.

Ben-Elia, E., Alexander, B., Hubers, C., & Ettema, D. (2014). Activity fragmentation, ICT and travel: An exploratory path analysis of spatiotemporal interrelationships. Transportation Research Part A, 68, 56–74.

Berrington, A., & Mikolai, J. (2014). Young adults’ license-holding and driving Behavior in the UK. Full Findings. London: RAC Foundation.

Cao, X. (2012). The relationships between e-shopping and store shopping in the shopping process of search goods. Transportation Research Part A, 46(7), 993–1002.

Cedersund, H. K., & Henriksson, P. (2006). En modell för att pronostisera ungdommars Körkortstagande. [A model for forecasting young people's propensity to obtain a driving license.] Linköping: Statens väg- och transportforskningsinstitut VTI.

Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity and design. Transportation Research Part D, 2(3), 199–219.

Chatterjee, K., Goodwin, P., Schwanen, T., Clark, B., Jain, J., Melia, S., Middleton, J., Plyushteva, A., Ricci, M., Santos, G., & Stokes, G. (2017). Young people’s travel — what’s changed and why? Review and analysis. Bristol, UK: University of Oxford, University of West England, Bristol.

Dargay, J. M. (2001). The effect of income on car ownership: Evidence of asymmetry. Transportation Research Part A, 35, 807–821.

Deffner, J., Götz, K., Schubert, S., Potting, C., Stete, G., Tschann, A., & Loose, W. (2006). Schlussbericht zu dem Projekt ‘‘Nachhaltige Mobilitätskultur.’’ Entwicklung eines integrierten Konzepts der Planung, Kommunikation und Implementierung einer nachhaltigen, multioptionalen Mobilitätskultur. [Final report on the sustainable mobility culture project. Development of an integrated concept for the planning, communication and implementation of a sustainable, multi-functional mobility culture.] Frankfurt am Main: Institut für sozial-ökologische Forschung.

Delbosc, A. (2017). Delay or forgo? A closer look at youth driver licensing trends in the United States and Australia. Transportation, 44(5), 919–926.

Delbosc, A., & Currie, G. (2013). Causes of youth licensing decline: A synthesis of evidence. Transport Reviews, 33(3), 271–290.

Delbosc, A., & Currie, G. (2014a). Changing demographics and young adult driver license decline in Melbourne, Australia (1994–2009). Transportation, 41(3), 529–542.

Delbosc, A., & Currie, G. (2014b). Using discussion forums to explore attitudes toward cars and licensing among young Australians. Transport Policy, 31, 27–34.

Deloitte. (2009). Connecting with Gen Y: Making cars cool again. Brussels: Deloitte.

De Vos, J. (2015). The influence of land use and mobility policy on travel behavior: A comparative case study of Flanders and the Netherlands. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 8(1), 171–190.

De Vos, J., Derudder, B., Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F. (2012). Reducing car use: Changing attitudes or relocating? The influence of residential dissonance on travel behavior. Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 1–9.

De Vos, J., Mokhtarian, P. L., Schwanen, T., Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F. (2016a). Travel mode choice and travel satisfaction: Bridging the gap between decision utility and experienced utility. Transportation, 43(5), 771–796.

De Vos, J., Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F. (2016b). Urban sprawl: Neighborhood dissatisfaction and urban preferences. Some evidence from Flanders. Urban Geography, 37(6), 839–862.

Döring, L., Albrecht, J., Scheiner, J., & Holz-Rau, C. (2014). Mobility biographies in three generations-socialization effects on commute mode choice. Transportation Research Procedia, 1(1), 165–176.

Döring, L., Albrecht, J., Scheiner, J., & Holz-Rau, C. (2015). Mobility socialization in work trip biographies: Work trips over the life course of two generations. Proceedings of the 94th Annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board (pp 11–15), Washington DC, January 2015.

Emond, C., & Handy, S. (2012). Factors associated with bicycling to high school: Insights from Davis, CA. Journal of Transport Geography, 20, 71–79.

Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294.

Goodwin, P. (2012). Three views on ‘peak car.’ World Transport Policy & Practice, 17(4), 8–17.

Goodwin, P., & Van Dender, K. (2013). ‘Peak car’ — Themes and conclusions. Transport Reviews, 33, 243–254.

Götz, K., & Deffner, J. (2009). Eine neue Mobilitätskultur in der Stadt–praktische Schritte zur Veränderung. [A new mobility culture in the city - practical steps to change.] In Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung (eds.), Urbane Mobilität. Verkehrsforschung des Bundes für die kommunale Praxis (pp 39–52). Bremerhaven: Wirtschaftsverlag NW, Verlag Für Neue Wissenschaft.

Groves, R. M. (1989). Survey errors and survey costs. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Harms, S. (2007). From university to working life: Impact of a critical life event on travel mode choice. Paper presented at the 7th Biennial Conference on Environmental Psychology, Bayreuth, Germany, September 12, 2007.

Haustein, S., Klöckner, C. A., & Blöbaum, A. (2009). Car use of young adults: The role of travel socialization. Transportation Research Part F, 12, 168–178.

Hjorthol, R. (2016). Decreasing popularity of the car? Changes in driving license and access to a car among young adults over a 25-year period in Norway. Journal of Transport Geography, 51, 140–146.

Hjorthol, R. J., & Bjørnskau, T. (2005). Gentrification in Norway capital, culture and convenience. European Urban and Regional Studies, 12(4), 353–371.

Jamieson, L., Cunningham-Burley, S., & Rawlins, E. (2012). Twenty + futures. ESRC Centre for Population Change, Briefing 8.

Jorritsma, P., & Berveling, J. (2014). Niet autoloos, maar auto later. Voor jongvolwassen blijft de auto een aantrekkelijk perspectief. [Not carless, but car-later. For young adults the car is still an attractive proposition.] Den Haag: Kennisinstituut voor Mobiliteitsbeleid.

Kitamura, R. (1988). Life-style and travel demand. Transportation Research Board Special Report, 220, 149–489.

Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Laidet, L. (1997). A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation, 24(2), 125–158.

Klinger, T., Kenworthy, J. R., & Lanzendorf, M. (2013). Dimensions of urban mobility cultures — A comparison of German cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 31, 18–29.

Klöckner, C.A., & Matthies, E. (2012). Two pieces of the same puzzle? Script-based car choice habits between the influence of socialization and past behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(4), 793–821.

Krantz, L. G. (1999). Rörlighetens mångfald och förändring. Befolkningens dagliga resande i Sverige 1978 och 1996. [Mobility diversity and change. Population’s daily travels in Sweden in 1978 and 1996.] Göteborg, Sweden: Kulturgeografisk institutionen, Handelshögskolan vid Göteborgs Universitet.

Kroesen, M., Handy, S., & Chorus, C. (2017). Do attitudes cause behavior or vice versa? An alternative conceptualization of the attitude-behavior relationship in travel behavior modeling. Transportation Research Part A, 101, 190–202.

Kuhnimhof, T., Armoogum, J., Buehler, R., Dargay, J., Denstadli, J., & Yamamoto, T. (2012a). Men shape a downward trend in car use among young adults: Evidence from six industrialized countries. Transport Reviews, 32(6), 761–779.

Kuhnimhof, T., Buehler, R., Wirtz, M., & Kalinowska, D. (2012b). Travel trends among young adults in Germany: Increasing multimodality and declining car use for men. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 443–450.

Lanzendorf, M. (2003). Mobility biographies. A new perspective for understanding travel behavior. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, Lucerne, August, 10–15, 2003.

Latinopoulos, C., Le Vine, S., Jones, P., & Polak, J. (2013). On the move: Car, rail and bus travel trends in Scotland. London: RAC Foundation.

Le Vine, S., & Jones, P. (2012). Making sense of car and train travel trends in Britain. London: RAC Foundation.

Le Vine, S., Jones, P., Lee-Gosselin, M., & Polak, J. (2014). Is heightened environmental-sensitivity responsible for the drop in young adults’ driving-license-acquisition rates? Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2465, 73–78.

Le Vine, S., Polak, J., & Kuhnimhof, T. (2013). Case study of Great Britain: Socioeconomic changes, and variations in driving trends by income and location. In Institut für Mobilitätsforschung/Institute for Mobility Research (Ed.), Mobility y: The emerging travel patterns of Generation Y (pp. 27-34). Munich: Institute for Mobility Research.

McDonald, N., & Trowbridge, M. (2009). Does the built environment affect when American teens become drivers? Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey. Journal of Safety Research, 40(3), 177–183.

Meeus, B., & De Decker, P. (2013). De geest van suburbia. [The spirit of suburbia.] Antwerpen-Apeldoorn: Garant.

Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap. (1997). Ruimtelijk Structuurplan Vlaanderen: Integrale versie. [Spatial structure plan for Flanders: full version.] Brussels: Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap.

Mokhtarian, P. L., & Cao, X. (2008). Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: A focus on methodologies. Transportation Research Part B, 42(3), 204–228.

Müggenburg, H., Busch-Geertsema, A., & Lanzendorf, M. (2015). Mobility biographies: A review of achievements and challenges of the mobility biographies approach and a framework for further research. Journal of Transport Geography, 46, 151–163.

Munters, Q. J. (1992). Bestaan leefstijlen (nog) wel? [Do lifestyles (still) exist?] Sociologische Gids, 39, 179–185.

Noble, B. (2005). Why are some young people choosing not to drive? Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, September 18–20, 2005.

Nordbakke, S. (2002). Førerkort og bilbruk blant ungdom på 90-tallet. Tegn på endringer i ungdoms reisevaner? [Driving license and car use among youth in the ‘90s. Signs of changes in youth travel habits?] Oslo: Transportøkonomisk institutt.

Næss, P. (2014). Tempest in a teapot: The exaggerated problem of transport-related residential self-selection as a source of error in empirical studies. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 7(3), 57–79.

Næss, P., Cao, J., & Strand, A. (2017). Which D’s are the important ones? The effects of regional location and density on driving distance in Oslo and Stavanger. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 10(1), 945–964.

Office for National Statistics. (2013). Family spending, 2013 Edition. London: Office for National Statistics.

Ottmann, P. (2007). Critical life events in the German Mobility Panel. Paper Presented at the 7th Biennial Conference on Environmental Psychology, Bayreuth, Germany, September 12, 2007.

Sakaria, N., & Stehfest, N. (2013). Millennials and mobility: Understanding the millennial mindset and new opportunities for transit providers. Retrieved from http://www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/169527.aspx.

Scheiner, J. (2007). Mobility biographies: Elements of a biographical theory of travel demand. Erdkunde, 61, 161–173.

Scheiner, J. (2010). Social inequalities in travel behavior: Trip distances in the context of residential self-selection and lifestyles. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 679–690.

Scheiner, J., & Holz-Rau, C. (2013). A comprehensive study of life course, cohort, and period effects on changes in travel mode use. Transportation Research A, 47, 167–181.

Schwanen, T., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005a). What affects commute mode choice: Neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods? Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 83–99.

Schwanen, T., & Mokhtarian, P.L. (2005b). What if you live in the wrong neighborhood? The impact of residential neighborhood type dissonance on distance travelled. Transportation Research Part D, 10(2), 127–151.

Sivak, M., & Schoettle, B. (2012). Recent changes in the age composition of drivers in 15 countries. Traffic Injury Prevention, 13(2), 126–132.

Stad Gent. (2016). Gent, meer dan studeren alleen. Actieplan studentenbeleid. [Ghent, more than studying. Student policy action plan]. Gent: Stad Gent.

Steunpunt Werk en Sociale Economie. (2015). Dalende arbeidsdeelname bij Vlaamse jongeren. [Declining employment among the Flemish youth.] Arbeidsmarktflits, 12 February 2015.

Swinnen, G., & Valkeneers, G. (2002). De milieubewuste automobilist: Een onderzoek naar het koop- en rijgedrag van Vlaamse chauffeurs. [The environmental conscious driver: An investigation into the buying and driving behavior of Flemish drivers.] Economisch en Sociaal Tijdschrift, 56, 437–471.

Van Acker, V. (2015). Peak car among Generation Y. Internal Research Report SEG. Ghent: Universiteit Gent.

Van Acker V. (2016). Lifestyle and modal choices: Defining, measuring and using the ‘lifestyle’ concept. Transportation Research Record, 2495, 74–82.

Van Acker, V. (2017). Peak car: A generational approach. Proceedings of the BIVEC-GIBET Transport Research Days 2017, Liège, Belgium, May 18–19.

Van Acker, V., Goodwin, P., & Witlox, F. (2016). Key research themes on behavior, lifestyle, and sustainable urban mobility. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(1), 25–32.

Van Acker, V., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Witlox, F. (2011). Going soft: On how subjective variables explain modal choices for leisure travel. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 11(2), 115–146.