Finding the right tools for the job: Instrument mixes for land use and transport integration in the Netherlands
Keywords:land use transport integration, policy integration, policy instruments, interaction, resource transfer
Governments have widely established policy goals, which span the domains of land use and transport. Despite these integrated ambitions, government action often remains fragmented. This study adopts an instrumental perspective to encourage land-use and transport integration (LUTI). So far, the existing literature on this subject has adopted a single-instrument perspective and has been primarily focused on technical, rather than governance-oriented, instruments. Using a comprehensive analytical framework derived from combining policy integration and policy instrument theory, this in-depth multiple case study of the Dutch provinces of Friesland, Overijssel and North Brabant investigates how governments use a mix of policy instruments throughout the policy process to achieve LUTI in collaboration with municipalities. These instruments are compared based on how they structure interaction — i.e., the transfer of resources — across horizontal and vertical boundaries. The study finds that there is not one right tool to achieve LUTI. Instead, it is about finding the right mix of instruments, which, in line with LUTI goals, helps overcome government fragmentation by structuring interaction patterns across horizontal and vertical boundaries. Interestingly, each province adopts a unique mix of instruments that reflects a specific approach, typical to the case.
Ansell, C. (2000). The networked polity: Regional development in Western Europe. Governance — An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions, 13(3), 303–333.
Arts, J., Filarski, R., Jeekel, H., & Toussaint, B. (2016). Builders and planners: A history of land-use and infrastructure planning in the Netherlands. Delft, the Netherlands: Eburon Academic Publishers.
Arts, J., Hanekamp, T., & Dijkstra, A. (2014). Integrating land-use and transport infrastructure planning: Towards adaptive and sustainable transport infrastructure. Paper presented at the Transport Research Arena, Paris.
Arts, J., Hanekamp, T., Linssen, R., & Snippe, J. (2016). Benchmarking integrated infrastructure planning across Europe – Moving forward to vital infrastructure networks and urban regions. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 303–312.
Bache, I., Flinders, M. V, & Marsden, G. (2015). Multi-level governance and climate change: Insights from transport policy. United Kingdom: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Banister, D. (2002). Transport planning, 2nd ed. London: Spon Press.
Banister, D. (2005). Unsustainable transport: City transport in the new century. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203003886
Banister, D., Anderton, K., Bonilla, D., Givoni, M. and Schwanen, T. (2011). Transportation and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36, 247–270.
Banister, D. & Berechman, Y. (2001). Transport investment and the promotion of economic growth. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(3), 209–218.
Bemelmans-Videc, M. L., Rist, R. C., & Vedung, E. O. (2011). Carrots, sticks, and sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Bertolini, L. (2012). Integrating mobility and urban development agendas: A manifesto. DisP–The Planning Review, 48(1), 16–26.
Bertolini, L., le Clercq, F. & Kapoen, L. (2005). Sustainable accessibility: A conceptual framework to integrate transport and land use plan-making. Two test-applications in the Netherlands and a reflection on the way forward. Transport Policy, 12(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.006
Bliemer, M. C. J., Mulley, C., & Moutou, C. J. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook on transport and urban planning in the developed world. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bressers, H. T. A., & O’toole, L. J. (2005). Instrument selection and implementation in a networked context. In P. Eliadis, M. M. Hill, & M. Howlett (Eds.), Designing government: From instruments to governance (pp. 132–153). London: McGill-Queen’s University Press Montreal and Kingston.
Candel, J. J. L., & Biesbroek, R. (2016). Toward a processual understanding of policy integration. Policy Sciences, 49(3), 211–231.
Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2019). Causal logics and mechanisms in policy design: How and why adopting a mechanistic perspective can improve policy design. Public Policy and Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076719827068
Cejudo, G. M., & Michel, C. L. (2017). Addressing fragmented government action: Coordination, coherence, and integration. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 745–767.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066.
Curtis, C. (2008). Planning for sustainable accessibility: The implementation challenge. Transport Policy, 15(2), 104–112.
Duffhues, J., & Bertolini, L. (2016). From integrated aims to fragmented outcomes: Urban intensification and transportation planning in the Netherlands. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 9(3), 15–34.
Dunleavy, P., & Hood, C. (1994). From old public administration to new public management. Public Money & Management, 14(3), 9–16.
ECMT (2002). Implementing sustainable urban travel policies: Final report. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789282112892-en
Eddington, R. (2006). The Eddington transport study: Transport’s role in sustaining the UK’s productivity and competitiveness. Norwich, England: HM Treasury.
Elverding, C., Graeff, J. D., Ketting, N., Koeman, N., Ru, H. D., & Scheltema, M. (2008). Sneller En Beter, Advies Commissie Versnelling Besluitvorming Infrastructurele Projecten. Retrieved from https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/kst-29385-18-b2.pdf
Ewing, R. and Cervero, R. (2001). Travel and the built environment: A synthesis. Transportation Research Record, 1780(1), 87–114.
Farrington, J., & Farrington, C. (2005). Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: Towards conceptualisation. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 1–12.
Geerlings, H., & Stead, D. (2003). The integration of land use planning, transport and environment in European policy and research. Transport Policy, 10(3), 187–196.
Gudmundsson, H., Hall, R.P., Marsden, G. & Zietsman, J. (2015). Sustainable transportation: Indicators, frameworks, and performance management. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Hatzopoulou, M., & Miller, E. J. (2008). Institutional integration for sustainable transportation policy in Canada. Transport Policy, 15(3), 149–162.
Heeres, N. (2017). Toward area-oriented approaches in infrastructure planning: Development of national highway networks in a local spatial context (Doctoral dissertation). University of Groningen. Retrieved from https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/publications/towards-areaoriented-approaches-in-infrastructure-planning(927e294a-19fa-4966-8a5b-f0cfbc5c1f49)/export.html
Heeres, N., Tillema, T., & Arts, J. (2012). Integration in Dutch planning of motorways: From “line” towards “area-oriented” approaches. Transport Policy, 24, 148–158.
Heeres, N., Tillema, T., & Arts, J. (2016). Dealing with interrelatedness and fragmentation in road infrastructure planning: An analysis of integrated approaches throughout the planning process in the Netherlands. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(3), 421–443.
Howlett, M. (2000). Managing the “hollow state”: Procedural policy instruments and modern governance. Canadian Public Administration, 43(4), 412–431.
Howlett, M. (2014a). From the “old” to the “new” policy design: Design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance. Policy Sciences, 47(3), 187–207.
Howlett, M. (2014b). Policy design: What, who, how and why? In C. Halpern, P. Lascoumes, and P. Le Galès (Eds.), L’instrumentation de l’action publique: Controverses, résistances, effets (pp. 281–316). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
Howlett, M. (2018). The contexts and components of policy design. In M. Howlett & I. Mukherjee (Eds.), Routledge handbook of policy design (pp. 20–33). New York: Routledge.
Howlett, M., & Lejano, R. P. (2013). Tales from the crypt: The rise and fall (and rebirth?) of policy design. Administration & Society, 45(3), 357–381.
Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2004). (Not so) “smart regulation”? Canadian shellfish aquaculture policy and the evolution of instrument choice for industrial development. Marine Policy, 28(2), 171–184.
Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2007). Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in “new governance arrangements.” Policy and Society, 26(4), 1–18.
Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2018). Coherence, congruence and consistency in policy mixes. In M. Howlett & I. Mukherjee (Eds.), Routledge handbook of policy design (pp. 389–403). New York: Routledge.
Howlett, M., & del Rio, P. (2015). The parameters of policy portfolios: Verticality and horizontality in design spaces and their consequences for policy mix formulation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(5), 1233–1245.
Hull, A. (2008). Policy integration: What will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities? Transport Policy, 15(2), 94–103.
Hull, A. (2010). Transport matters: Integrated approaches to planning city-regions. New York: Routledge.
ITF. (2019). Improving transport planning and investment through the use of accessibility indicators. In International Transport Forum Policy Papers. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Jochim, A. E., & May, P. J. (2010). Beyond subsystems: Policy regimes and governance. Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 303–327.
Johansson, F., Tornberg, P., & Fernström, A. (2018). A function-oriented approach to transport planning in Sweden: Limits and possibilities from a policy perspective. Transport Policy, 63, 30–38.
Jones, P., & Lucas, K. (2000). Integrating transport into “joined-up” policy appraisal. Transport Policy, 7(3), 185–193.
Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2010). Environmental policy integration: A state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(3), 147–158.
Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K. W., & Zito, A. (2005). The rise of “new” policy instruments in comparative perspective: Has governance eclipsed government? Political Studies, 53(3), 477–496.
Keast, R., Brown, K., & Mandell, M. (2007). Getting the right mix: Unpacking integration meanings and strategies. International Public Management Journal, 10(1), 9–33.
Kelly, E. D. (1994).The transportation land-use link. Journal of Planning Literature, 9(2), 128–145.
Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). Governance networks in the public sector. New York: Routledge.
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
Lahdenperä, P. (2012). Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. Construction Management and Economics, 30(1), 57–79.
Lascoumes, P., & Le Gales, P. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments—From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x
Lenferink, S., Tillema, T., & Arts, J. (2013). Towards sustainable infrastructure development through integrated contracts: Experiences with inclusiveness in Dutch infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management, 31(4), 615–627.
Leroy, P., & Arts, B. (2006). Institutional dynamics in environmental governance. In Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance (pp. 1–19). New York: Springer.
Lieu, J., Spyridaki, A. N., Alvarez-Tinoco, R., van der Gaast, W., Tuerk, A., & van Vliet, O. (2018). Evaluating consistency in environmental policy mixes through policy, stakeholder, and contextual interactions. Sustainability, 10(6), 1896. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061896
Macario, R., Carvalho, D., & Fermisson, J. (2005). Achieving sustainable transport and land use with integrated policies. In S. Syngellakis (Ed.), WIT Transactions on the built environment. Southampton, UK: WIT Press.
Marsden, G., & Reardon, L. (2017). Questions of governance: Rethinking the study of transportation policy. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 101, 238–251.
Marsden, G. R., & May, A. D. (2006). Do institutional arrangements make a difference to transport policy and implementation? Lessons for Britain. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24(5), 771–789.
Marshall, S., & Banister, D. (2007). Land use and transport: European research towards integrated policies. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
May, A. D., Kelly, C., Shepherd, S., & Jopson, A. (2012). An option generation tool for potential urban transport policy packages. Transport Policy, 20, 162–173.
May, T., & Crass, M. (2007). Sustainability in transport: Implications for policy makers. Transportation Research Record, 2017(1), 1–9.
Mitchell, R .B., & Rapkin, C. (1954). Urban traffic: A function of land use. New York: Columbia University Press.
Moeckel, R., Llorca Garcia, C., Moreno Chou, A. T., & Okrah, M. B. (2018). Trends in integrated land use/transport modeling: An evaluation of the state of the art. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1) 463–476.
Mu, R., & de Jong, M. (2016). A network governance approach to transit-oriented development: Integrating urban transport and land-use policies in Urumqi, China. Transport Policy, 52, 55–63.
OECD (2014). OECD Territorial reviews: Netherlands 2014. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264209527-en
Overijssel. (2017). Catalogus Gebiedskenmerken. Provincie Overijssel, Zwolle.
Papa, E., Silva, C., te Brömmelstroet, M., & Hull, A. (2016). Accessibility instruments for planning practice: A review of European experiences. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 9(3), 57–75.
Peters, B. G. (2015). Pursuing horizontal management. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Peters, B. G. (2018a). Policy problems and policy design. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Peters, B. G. (2018b). The challenge of policy coordination. Policy Design and Practice, 1(1), 1–11.
Peters, B. G., Capano, G., Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., Chou, M.-H., & Ravinet, P. (2018). Designing for policy effectiveness: Defining and understanding a concept. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis — New public management, governance, and the neo-weberian state. Oxford, England: Oxford Univeristy Press.
Poppelaars, C. (2007). Resource exchange in urban governance: On the means that matter. Urban Affairs Review, 43(1), 3–27.
Rayner, J. & Howlett, M. (2009). Introduction: Understanding integrated policy strategies and their evolution. Policy and Society, 28(2), 99–109.
Rli. (2016). Closer and faster: Opportunities for better accessiblity in urban regions. The Hague: Council for the Living Environment and Infrastructure.
Rogge, K. S., & Reichardt, K. (2016). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy, 45(8), 1620–1635.
Salamon, L. M. (2000). The new governance and the tools of public action: An introduction. Fordham Urb. LJ, 28, 1611–1674.
Silva, C., Bertolini, L., te Brömmelstroet, M., Milakis, D., & Papa, E. (2017). Accessibility instruments in planning practice: Bridging the implementation gap. Transport Policy, 53(9), 135–145.
Stead, D. (2008). Institutional aspects of integrating transport, environment and health policies. Transport Policy, 15(3), 139–148.
Stead, D. (2016). Key research themes on governance and sustainable urban mobility. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(1), 40–48.
Stead, D., Geerlings, H., & Meijers, E. (Eds.). (2004). Policy integration in practice: The integration of land-use planning, transport and environmental policy making in Denmark, England and Germany. Delft: Delft University Press.
Stead, D., & Marshall, S. (2001). The relationships between urban form and travel patterns. An international review and evaluation. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 1(2). Retrieved from https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/index.php/ejtir/article/view/3497
Stead, D., & Meijers, E. (2009). Spatial planning and policy integration: Concepts, facilitators and inhibitors. Planning Theory & Practice, 10(3), 317–332.
Straatemeier, T. (2008). How to plan for regional accessibility? Transport Policy, 15(2), 127–137.
Switzer, A., Bertolini, L. & Grin, J. (2013). Transitions of mobility systems in urban regions: A heuristic framework. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 15(2), 141–160.
te Brömmelstroet, M. (2010). Equip the warrior instead of manning the equipment: Land use and transport planning support in the Netherlands. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 3(1), 25–41.
te Brömmelstroet, M., & Bertolini, L. (2010). Integrating land use and transport knowledge in strategy-making. Transportation, 37(1), 85–104.
Torfing, J. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Tornberg, P., & Odhage, J. (2018). Making transport planning more collaborative? The case of strategic choice of measures in Swedish transport planning. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 118, 416–429.
Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017). Policy integration: Mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38(6), 553–570.
Trein, P., Meyer, I., & Maggetti, M. (2019). The integration and coordination of public policies: A systematic comparative review. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(4), 332–349.
UN-Habitat (2013). Planning and design for sustainable urban mobility: Global report on human settlements 2013. New York: Routledge.
V&W. (1977). Structuurschema Verkeer En Vervoer - Deel a: Beleidsvoornemen, Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat.
van Geet, M. T., Lenferink, S., Arts, J., & Leendertse, W. (2019). Understanding the ongoing struggle for land use and transport integration: Institutional incongruence in the Dutch national planning process. Transport Policy, 73, 84–100.
van Geet, M. T., Lenferink, S., & Leendertse, W. (2019). Policy design dynamics: Fitting goals and instruments in transport infrastructure planning in the Netherlands. Policy Design and Practice, 2(4), 324–358.
van Wee, B., Annema, J.A., & Banister, D. (2013). The transport system and transport policy: An introduction. Cheltenham, UK, and Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Wegener, M., & Fürst, F. (1999). Land-use transport interaction: State of the art. Reports from the Institute for Spatial Planning 46. Dortmund, Germany: Universität Dortmund - Fakultät Raumplanung.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Marijn T. van Geet, Sander Lenferink, Tim Busscher, Jos Arts
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JTLU agree to the following terms: 1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. 3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.