Published
2024-03-18
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zhongzhen Yang, Jionghao Li, Wenyuan Zhou, Feng Lian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JTLU agree to the following terms: 1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. 3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Optimization of the subsidy for university faculty relocation in campus suburbanization
Zhongzhen Yang
Donghai Academy, Ningbo University
Jionghao Li
Ningbo University
Wenyuan Zhou
Ningbo University
Feng Lian
Ningbo University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2024.2341
Keywords: Urbanization, University suburbanization, Transportation accessibility, Housing location, Financial subsidy
Abstract
This study explores the optimal subsidy policy to maximize the benefits associated with the suburbanization of university campuses. A transport accessibility index is introduced, and a model is developed to analyze faculty housing relocation, incorporating factors such as transport accessibility, housing price, relocation subsidy, and the influence of children. The impact of housing relocation is assessed using a regional output model that considers both production and consumption aspects. Subsequently, a decision-making model is established to determine the optimal subsidy level and the number of faculty to relocate, with the overarching goal of maximizing total regional benefits. The findings reveal that an increase in subsidies correlates with a rise in the willingness of faculty to relocate, leading to heightened benefits for the region. However, the rate of benefit increase shows diminishing returns with each increment change in the subsidy. Notably, the study demonstrates that 70% of the additional benefits to the region emanate from the housing market, accurately reflecting the current financial landscape in China. This insight underscores why city governments frequently leverage land markets to actively promote suburbanization.
References
Allison, J., & Eversole, R. (2008). A new direction for regional university campuses: Catalyzing innovation in place. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 21(2), 95–109.
Bauer, T. K., Braun, S. T., & Kvasnicka, M. (2017). Nuclear power plant closures and local housing values: Evidence from Fukushima and the German housing market. Journal of Urban Economics, 99, 94–106.
Ben-Akiva, M. E., Choi, S., Park, C., & Park, J. (2014). A spatial-temporal analysis of population and employment growth for Southern California. The Annals of Regional Science, 52(1), 19–40.
Bhat, C., Handy, S., Kockelman K., Mahmassani, H., Gopal, A., Srour, I., & Weston, L. (2002). Development of an urban accessibility index: Formulations, aggregation, and application. Austin, TX: Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas.
Burns, L. D., & Golob, T. F. (1976). The role of accessibility in basic transportation choice behavior. Transportation, 5, 175–198.
Church, R. L., & Marston, J. R. (2003). Measuring accessibility for people with a disability. Geographical Analysis, 35(1), 83–96.
Dalvi, M. Q., & Martin, K. M. (1976). The measurement of accessibility: Some preliminary results. Transportation, 5(1), 17– 42.
Denison, E. F. (1962). Sources of economic growth in the United States and the alternatives before us. The Journal of Finance, 17(4),704.
Elldér, E. (2014). Residential location and daily travel distances: The influence of trip purpose. Journal of Transport Geography, 34, 121–130.
Felsenstein, D. (1996). The university in the metropolitan area: Impacts and public policy implications. Urban Studies, 33, 1568–1580.
Goldner, W. (1971). The Lowry model heritage. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 37(2), 100–110.
Goldstein, H., & Drucker, J. (2006). The economic development impacts of universities on regions: Do size and distance matter? Economic Development Quarterly, 20(1), 22–43.
Grengs, J. (2010). Job accessibility and the modal mismatch in Detroit. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), 42– 54.
Guiliano, G., & Narayan, D. (2005). A comparison of work and non-work travel: the US and Great Britain (pp. 111–129). London: Spon Press.
Hamidi, S., & Ewing, R. (2014). A longitudinal study of changes in urban sprawl between 2000 and 2010 in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 128, 72–82.
Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2), 73– 76.
Heider, B., & Siedentop, S. (2020). Employment suburbanization in the 21st century: A comparison of German and US city regions. Cities, 104, 102802.
Ingram, D. R. (1971). The concept of accessibility: A search for an operational form. Regional Studies, 5(2), 101–107.
Karou , S., & Hull, A. (2014). Accessibility modelling: Predicting the impact of planned transport infrastructure on accessibility patterns in Edinburgh, UK. Journal of Transport Geography, 35, 1– 11.
Lakshmanan, T. R., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P., & Verhoef, E. T. (2001). Benefits and costs of transport. Papers in Regional Science, 80(2), 139–164.
Li, Z., Li, X., & Wang L. (2014). Speculative urbanism and the making of university towns in China: A case of Guangzhou University Town. Habitat International, 44, 422– 431.
Lowry, I. S. (1964). A model of metropolis. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.
Lu, H. P., Wang, J. F., & Zhang, Y. B. (2009). Model and application of transport accessibility in urban transport planning. Journal of Tsinghua University (Natural Science Edition), 6, 781–785.
Lucas, K., Van Wee, B., & Maat, K. (2016). A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: Combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches. Transportation, 43(3), 473–490.
Luo, J. Y. (2008). The radiation effect of university town and the rise of educational real estate. Consumption Tribune, 16,161.
Marwal, A., & Silva, E. (2022). Literature review of accessibility measures and models used in land use and transportation planning in last 5 years. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 32, 560–584.
Osman T., Shaw D., & Kenawy, E. (2018). An integrated land use change model to simulate and predict the future of greater Cairo metropolitan region. Journal of Land Use Science, 13(6), 565–584.
Ouředníček, M., (2007). Differential suburban development in the Prague urban region. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 89(2),111–126.
Páez, A., Scott, D. M., & Morency, C. (2012). Measuring accessibility: Positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 141–153.
Rahel, N., & Christian, S. (2016). Beyond the urban–suburban divide: Urbanization and the production of the urban in Zurich north. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(3), 679–701.
Reyes, M., Páez, A., & Morency, C. (2014). Walking accessibility to urban parks by children: A case study of Montreal. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 38–47.
Rossi, F., & Goglio, V. (2020). Satellite university campuses and economic development in peripheral regions. Studies in Higher Education, 45(1), 34–54.
Ruoppila, S., & Zhao, F. (2017). The role of universities in developing China’s university towns: The case of Songjiang university town in Shanghai. Cities, 69, 56–63.
Schaldach, R., & Alcamo, J. (2007). Simulating the effects of urbanization, afforestation and cropland abandonment on a regional carbon balance: A case study for Central Germany. Regional Environmental Change, 7(3), 137–148.
Sharma, G., & Patil, G. R. (2022). Spatial and social inequities for educational services accessibility—A case study for schools in Greater Mumbai. Cities, 122, 103543.
Shen J. (2022). Universities as financing vehicles of suburbanization: The development of university towns in Shanghai. Land Use Policy, 112, 104679.
Shi, X. L. (2006). Summary of depreciation of fixed assets in highway management enterprises. Finance & Accounting for Communications, 9, 44–45.
Wang, D., Gong, Z. G., & Yang, Z. Z. (2018). Design of industrial clusters and optimization of land use in an airport economic zone. Land Use Policy, 77, 288–297.
Wu, Z. M. (2008). Study on the suburban universities’ impetus to the suburban development: A case study of Chengdu suburbia. Journal of Chengdu University, 4, 53–58.
Xia, Y. F. (2012). Function of college suburbanization in suburb urbanization: A case study of Xindu district of Chengdu city in China. Journal of Landscape Research, 5, 23–26 & 30.
Yang, Z. Z., Zhu, X. C., & Moodie, D. (2015). Optimization of land use in a new urban district. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 14(2), 05014010-1.
Yi, D. L. (2021). Accessibility analysis of distance education resources based on multiple constraint model. The International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, 60(1), 002072092092098503.
Yu, Q. L. (1985). Denison economic growth factor analysis. Foreign Economics & Management, 6, 33–36.
Zheng, L., Van Wee, B., & Oeser, M. (2019). Combining accessibilities for different activity types. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 12(1), 853–872.
Zhuge, C., Shao, C., Gao J., Dong, C., & Zhang, H. (2016). Agent-based joint model of residential location choice and real estate price for land use and transport model. Computers, Environment & Urban Systems, 57, 93–105.
